Jon Venables to remain behind bars after telling Parole Board he does not seek release

A Parole Board panel decided that Jon Venables should remain in prison after he told them he was not seeking release, citing concerns about his ability to work with probation staff and address his sexual interests.

One of the killers of James Bulger is to remain behind bars after he told a Parole Board panel he should stay in prison.

The photo first issued 20/02/93 of James Bulger's killer Jon Venables.placeholder image
The photo first issued 20/02/93 of James Bulger's killer Jon Venables. | Press Association

Jon Venables told parole staff dealing with his latest review, which took place in private, that he was not seeking release.

A summary of the panel’s findings, published on Monday, said: “At the outset of the hearing, Mr Venables submitted an opening statement to the effect that he accepted the need to undertake further offending work in custody and so was not seeking release.”

The panel considered evidence from probation officers based in the prison and in the community, three psychologists, and a psychiatrist, and all bar one found that he should remain in prison.

Venables tortured and murdered two-year-old James in 1993 after he and Robert Thompson, both then aged 10, snatched him from a shopping centre in Bootle, Merseyside.

Venables was released on licence in July 2001 and recalled to prison in February 2010, after indecent images of children were found on his computer.

He was once again freed in August 2013 and then called back in November 2017 for the same offence, and parole judges considered his case again in September 2020.

In the latest review, a “victim personal statement which clearly conveyed the devastating impact of Mr Venables’ crime and the impact of his offending” was heard by the panel.

Members found that there were concerns about how well Venables would work with probation staff if released and “how open and honest he would be in supervision”.

They said there is “a need for further work in custody to address his sexual interests”.

The summary went on: “Mr Venables articulated his protracted and extreme remorse for his crime. Professionals assessed this to be genuine and sincere.”

Panel members decided that they were “not satisfied that Mr Venables was suitable for release”.

Related topics:
News you can trust since 1886
Follow us
© 2026 Iconic Media Group Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice