Driver who dragged cyclist under car was ‘selfish’ but not a murderer, jury told

‘You are likely to hold Simon Richardson in contempt. That contempt may well manifest itself in a loathing of Simon Richardson and, in fairness, you are probably right to do so’ | North West court news

A motorist who dragged a cyclist trapped under his car for more than a mile was responsible for his death but that did not make him a murderer, a court has heard.

Simon Richardson, 35, is on trial at Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court accused of the murder of headteacher Michael Mullins, 56, who was knocked off his bike as he travelled home from Stretford Grammar School in Manchester.

Richardson drove through give way markers at a junction in Warburton, Altrincham, and struck Mr Mullins, who then went under his Volvo XC90 on the early evening of April 20.

Mr Mullins became entangled in the suspension of the 4×4 vehicle as Richardson drove away from Paddock Lane and travelled 2.2 kilometres, leaving behind a trail of blood.

A motorcyclist followed the trail and discovered Mr Mullins alone and barely breathing as he lay on a grass verge in a secluded country lane in Lymm, Cheshire.

Emergency services attended and Mr Mullins was pronounced dead at the scene shortly after.

In his closing speech to jurors on Tuesday, Jaime Hamilton KC, defending, said: “You are likely to hold Simon Richardson in contempt. That contempt may well manifest itself in a loathing of Simon Richardson and, in fairness, you are probably right to.

“Because it is right that we acknowledge it was the actions of Simon Richardson that led to the death of Michael Mullins.

“Not only is he responsible for the death of Michael Mullins, he acted in the most selfish of ways with one thought in his mind – himself.

“But that does not make him guilty of the homicide offences on this indictment.”

Michael Mullins, who was mowed down and dragged for more than a mile to his death as he became trapped underneath a car.placeholder image
Michael Mullins, who was mowed down and dragged for more than a mile to his death as he became trapped underneath a car. | Greater Manchester Police/PA Wire
Defendant Simon Richardson in his vehicle after the fatal collision with cyclist Michael Mullinsplaceholder image
Defendant Simon Richardson in his vehicle after the fatal collision with cyclist Michael Mullins | CPS/Press Association

He said the prosecution had made a “conscious decision” to limit the jury’s choices to murder, manslaughter or “not responsible at all”, rather than putting offences of causing death by dangerous or careless driving on the indictment.

Prosecutors say Richardson’s criminal actions began at the point he was aware Mr Mullins was underneath his car shortly after the collision, which he denies, but drove on anyway.

It is alleged Richardson stopped at the country lane and twice got out of the vehicle in attempts to pull Mr Mullins free, which he also denies.

Richardson then mounted the grass verge in his Volvo and finally dislodged him before he reversed over Mr Mullins causing “crushing” injuries to his chest.

The defendant’s cousin, front-seat passenger Gabrielle Debotte, previously told the court that both heard “moaning” shortly after the collision in Paddock Lane and that he went on to say: “He is under the car.”

But Mr Hamilton said Ms Debotte had “changed” her accounts of the journey in various statements to the police and in evidence to the jury.

He said: “One of the things that you will have to do in your assessment of Gabrielle Debotte is to ask yourself, is she a honest, accurate and reliable witness?

“We say she is a narrator prepared to say whatever it takes to remove her further away from any sort of responsibility, and as a consequence to shift Simon Richardson ever closer to whatever suits her at the moment.”

He added the prosecution had been “blind to the distinct possibility” that Mr Mullins was run over by one of the front wheels of the car in the initial moments of the earlier collision.

Jurors have been told that to convict Richardson of murder they must be sure that for at least part of the time from when Mr Mullins was dragged under the car to being left on the grass verge that he intended to kill or seriously harm him.

Trial judge Mrs Justice Brunner said they must also be certain the injuries sustained during that period were more than a minimal contribution to Mr Mullins’s death.

On the alternative offence of manslaughter, she said jurors must be sure that the defendant assaulted Mr Mullins which, again, was more than a minimal contribution to his death.

The defence say there was no assault committed because Richardson did not realise that Mr Mullins was or possibly may be under the car.

Richardson denies murder, manslaughter and a separate allegation of dangerous driving on April 21 following a police pursuit before he was arrested.

News you can trust since 1886
Follow us
© 2026 Iconic Media Group Ltd. All rights reserved.Cookie SettingsTerms and ConditionsPrivacy notice