Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 12th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Street access fears over Tithebarn



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Preston's new-look city centre will be patrolled by a private army of security guards – but there are fears the streets could become privately owned.
The Preston Tithebarn Partnership has announced that once the £700m transformation is completed in 2014 the city will be patrolled by guards round the clock.

This move to ensure the city centre is a safe environment has prompted concerns that developer Grosvenor could apply to have the public right of way scrapped, meaning access to streets could be barred if it wished.

In Liverpool, where Grosvenor is close to completing its £1bn Liverpool One redevelopment, the public's rights of way on some streets is to be scrapped under 'public realm agreements'.

The developer could ask for similar agreements on the land it has been given by Preston Council on a 250-year lease.

Donald Lee, of the North West branch of the Open Spaces Society, said that legal rights to walk down 33 streets in Liverpool had been replaced by "grace-and-favour access" – and he added Preston could suffer the same.

He said: "It is a cancer that is growing all over the place. Liverpool is just the latest in a long line of these kind of developments which have had these measures."

The society has unsuccessfully challenged the moves at public inquiries into developments in Liverpool and Wigan in recent years.

Mr Lee said: "We will give our two penn'orth if there is an inquiry in Preston."

In Liverpool, Grosvenor project director Rod Holmes has said the firm's vision for the 43-acre site in the city centre was aimed at "refinding" the city's streets.

He vowed there would be no gates in any part of its development and that people would have 24-hour access to all parts of the scheme. It is unclear whether there will be a similar scheme in Preston.

A spokesman for the Preston Tithebarn Partnership (PTP) said: "The Tithebarn scheme is designed around a series of streets and open spaces that form a natural extension to the city centre.

"It will benefit from round-the-clock security to ensure that it remains a safe and attractive place for shoppers, residents and other users of the city centre.

"While the scheme will be owned and managed privately, the streets and spaces will be open to the public 24 hours a day."

The idea of round-the-clock security has raised fears among business leaders that it could have a devastating impact on the rest of the city.

Nicholas Watson, chief executive of Preston's Chamber of Trade, said: "It is going to be very difficult for the police to be able to match that bar.

"If the security is going to be that intense, hopefully in a way it will encourage people to come into the city but I don't believe it will bode well for the existing shopping area."

Frank McKenna, chairman of lobby group Downtown Preston in Business, said: "Once you get a situation where one part of the city is fully secure then the inevitable consequence is it potentially has a detrimental effect on the rest of the city – why would people step out of this comfort zone?"

>> Take part in our special survey about the Tithebarn development

>> Vote in our latest web poll

i-map

The full article contains 553 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 May 2008 8:58 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

David C,

05/05/2008 12:07:09
Again in Liverpool, Preston will have nothing to attract people in. Give this scheme the elbow before Preston is a run down version of Liverpool and Manchester. Let real investors in so Preston will have its own unique Identity and be somewhere, were people will shop for a break from the normal. The People of Preston are being robbed and in a few years time they will be paying for it. Businesses for the people of Preston will be gone.
2

River,

05/05/2008 23:22:43
This is the privatisation of public space.

The right to public assembly - fought for by the Chartists who died in numbers for it in Preston, is being thrown away by an undemocratic council blinded by £ signs.
3

barnfarm,

06/05/2008 14:56:04
Be afraid. Very afraid. Good article on public realm agreements here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/mar/29/communities
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.