Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

No end to queues at busy junction



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 September 2008
Drivers will continue to be stuck in queues at a busy junction after road bosses said there was nothing they could do to solve the problem.
Highways chiefs came under fire for failing to come up with an answer to the morning and evening tailbacks along the city centre-bound side of Tulketh Brow in Ashton, Preston.

The congestion is caused by traffic turning right on to Water Lane, backing up into one lane and stopping cars from continuing along Fylde Road.

As part of plans for 12 homes at Ashton Basin, off Tulketh Brow, Lancashire County Council was asked to come up with a way of easing the problem.

But the authority said there was nothing it could do. Tulketh Brow could not be widened without the demolition of houses 38-42.

Coun Tom Davies (Con), a member of Preston Council's planning committee, said: "I really feel these people at LCC must never travel down this road. It's not adequate.

"If we're allowing the development to take place, now is the time to get that road sorted.

"Now is the time to move that roundabout over to the left and get that second lane in. This nonsense about knocking houses down is scaremongering.

"They could make that footpath a lot smaller and that would help that road and move everything across."

Coun Alan Hackett (Lib Dem) said: "The council doesn't always get it right and I don't think they've tried hard enough this time."

John Lindsay, principal planning officer at Preston Council, said a highways consultant claimed road improvements would be "over and above reasonable works associated with a development of this magnitude" and it "could be detrimental in safety terms and would not necessarily improve traffic flow".

In the end, councillors voted seven to four in favour of the 12 new homes with parking proposed by British Waterways, despite nine letters of objection from residents.

A spokesman for Lancashire County Council said: "Lancashire County Council has provided comments to Preston Council regarding the proposed development and its impact on the highway network.

"It is up to Preston Council's planning committee to consider the application, and approval or otherwise of the application rests with the planning committee."

The full article contains 375 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 September 2008 11:37 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

,

03/09/2008 13:04:22
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

ATP,

uk 03/09/2008 14:35:52
Eric
I agree 100% with what you say
They should also think about the residents of this town for a change, another example of a good place for roundabouts would be ALL the junctions off Tom Benson Way/Lightfoot Lane and Eastway - sometimes impossible to get out, when a simple solution for everyone would be a roundabout.
3

A M Bell,

Preston 03/09/2008 15:29:31
Easy to solve.
Dump the traffic lights and install roundabouts at the bottom of Tulketh Brow and Watery Lane! Then see the 24 hour efficiency saving! Then move on from there!!!
But that would mean a few job losses at County Hall maintaining the traffic lights!!!
4

Peregrine,

Ashton 03/09/2008 16:01:10

The majority of roads in Preston now are inadequate. Further up Fylde Road they still have a bridge that isn't wide enough for traffic and buses to use it at the same time!

5

barnfarm,

03/09/2008 16:19:27
Even easier to solve than that - make it plain to all prospective developers that council taxpayers will no longer be left to pick up the bill when they set out to make a quick buck. If British Waterways wants to build, they should fund the alterations deemed necessary.
6

Eric Cartman,

Preston 03/09/2008 17:51:37
Which idiot pulled my 'unoffensive' post.

Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.