Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Motorway junctions campaign stepped up



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
25 April 2008
Ministers have been asked to reconsider allowing the building of new motorway junctions in a bid to ease traffic chaos in Lancashire.
Transport bosses have come under fresh pressure to ease restrictions on building new junctions on the M6 and M55 because of the county's growing highway hell.

Tory MP for Lancaster and Wyre Ben Wallace told the House of Commons roads in his constituency were under "tremendous traffic pressure" because of Preston's urban sprawl.

There are more than 55,000 cars clogging Preston's streets and traffic volumes across Lancashire are up 13% across the county compared to a decade ago.

Current predictions suggest journey times and congestion will rocket by 40% in the next 15 years – with in excess of 77,000 cars in Preston alone.

Last year the Evening Post reported how Preston Council leader Ken Hudson reignited the debate over a new M6 junction between 32 at Broughton and 33 at Galgate in a bid to relieve chronic congestion in the north of the city.

Traffic there is set to get worse with the Royal Lancashire Show moving to Myerscough next year, plans for 600-plus homes on the old Whittingham Hospital site and a new garden centre opening in Brock.
Many new homes are also planned for Garstang.

All that, says Coun Hudson, could have knock-on effects for the whole of Preston and many see a "junction 32A" as the only viable answer.

Ultimately, he says, it will lead to gridlock. He adds: "We are going to keep banging the drum because if the Government keeps saying we need all these extra houses – and it is possible that Preston will be designated as a growth area – that means more traffic and we need to make better use of the motorway to dissipate it."

Hugh Bladon, a founder member of lobby group the Association of British Drivers (ABD), says his organisation is currently campaigning for an extra motorway junction between Weston-super-Mare and Bristol in the south-west of England.

He says: "To pretend that people are not going to get into their cars and drive to work is just pie in the sky. We need solutions and extra motorway junctions is one of them."

The Government has made it clear that a firm case for a new junction would need to be established. Guidance published by the Department for Transport last year stated that ministers would have a "general presumption against additional access to motorways".

But Transport Minister Tom Harris insists that "ministers do have some level of discretion to go beyond that guidance where it seems necessary".

However, he adds: "I would expect the local authorities to be working with the Highways Agency to come up with alternative solutions so that we did not need to create any extra junctions on any of our motorways.

"If there is a case for creating an extra junction I would be happy to look at that.

"However, I would be reluctant to move from the stated policy, since it is one that is designed to ensure a free flowing of traffic and to maintain a high level of road safety."

The full article contains 529 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 April 2008 10:14 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Long live speed limits,

Fylde 26/04/2008 09:45:18
We need better integrated public transport
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.