Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Lancashire m-way could be widened



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
09 October 2007
A stretch of motorway could be widened in a bid to ease Lancashire's congestion nightmare.
Community leaders and transport experts have welcomed the scheme.
Robin Cummins, of the RAC, said: "We would welcome anything that is going to put another lane on the motorway and get the traffic moving.

"Not only is it going to help reduce congestion, it will improve road safety as well."

Brian Gregory, chairman of the Association of British Drivers, said: "In these sorts of areas the more lanes you have the better.

"If you could keep three lanes on the M6 and two lanes going off to the M55 that has got to be good news."

Preston Council leader Ken Hudson, who has called for an extra motorway junction near Garstang, said: "I think this would be an absolutely ideal solution to the problem and at the same time they should look at an extra junction."

But not everyone agrees it is the answer.

Aiden Turner-Bishop, of the Lancashire-based Campaign for Better Transport, said: "It is not really going to solve the problem of increasing traffic.

"It might be a temporary fix but it is not a long-term solution."

Coun Stuart Greenhalgh, who covers the Garrison ward of Preston, was "intrigued" to hear of the proposed motorway expansion and said: "I can't really see it having an effect on my ward, but by doing that it might increase the likelihood of making 31A a full- blown junction. I would have concern about that."

>> Latest travel information

i-map

The full article contains 260 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 October 2007 9:46 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

David C,

09/10/2007 14:24:25
Still think a Motorway from the M6 to Liverpool and Penwortham would be a better help. And a Junction just for those that miss Junction 32 turn off and head towards Lancashire. Its easy to do and I bet a common problem, so a Junctio allowing people to come off the motorway and get back on, on the other side if they do miss and would benefit the Emergency Services. You can widen Motorways all you like, but it will still block up, remember the Last Wideing of the M6 to 4 lanes, All the old bridges having to be replaced, weeks later Traffic Jams. I think a look into were people are going and why, is needed for Preston, because it will only get worse if the right action is taken.
2

Pear,

09/10/2007 20:37:31
I'm a driver and I disagree with the road widening idea. Everyone can predict the extra lane will soon be full as well because when road are built or expanded they are filled to capacity almost immediately. New junctions are a good idea if one was placed the other side of Broughton because this could finally be a solution to the Broughton bypass which was never built. Changing 31A to a full junction would be a good plan as well because this would obviously take the load off the other junctions. However it would slow down the traffic heading past Preston on the M6. In theory everyone would on the motorway quicker but once on there they would be traveling slower.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.