Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Are cameras just cash cows?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
16 May 2008
The number of fines dished out for speeding on Lancashire's roads is more than DOUBLE what it was a decade ago, latest figures show.
But although the number of fines given out in the county is falling, the Government still raked in more than £3.4m from the county's drivers last year.

Road safety bosses today claimed the fall was evidence speed cameras were proving effective.

But critics say there has been no big change in the number of people killed or seriously injured.

And they are "appalled" that cash is going straight to the Government to be used on whatever they want.

In 2006/7 figures show 57,500 speed camera fines were given out – raking in £3.45m based on the normal £60 fine.

The partnership spent a total of £2.6m on identifying sites, enforcement, payments and administration and public relations.

But, in reality, the number of people caught speeding will be far higher.

In 2005/6 119,594 fixed penalty notices were handed out – but only just over half of those (66,023 – £3.9m worth) were actually paid.

A further 32,139 people went on a speed awareness courses, which cost £90 – raising a further £2.8m.

Another 5,911 tickets were cancelled for a number of reasons, including the fact drivers could not be traced or because vehicles were from abroad.

In addition, 13,789 people were taken to court because of failure to pay the fines or because of excessive speed.

A full breakdown for 2006/7 has not yet been made available. But anti-speed camera campaigners say they are disgusted that a change in the way road safety partnerships are funded means that cash can be used by the Government for whatever they want.

The Government now provides a grant to local highways authorities, with only a part of it used to fund road safety partnerships.

Last year Lancashire County Council received around £3m from central Government.

Claire Armstrong, of campaigners Safe Speed, said: "The overall figures are not coming down. When are they going to realise that speed cameras are not the answer?

"We are also appalled that very little of this money will go back into road safety."

In 1997 just 23,800 speeding tickets – around £1.4m worth – were handed out to speeders.

Lancashire Partnership for Road Safety has said accidents have dropped dramatically in areas where speed cameras are placed.

But there has been no dramatic drop in the number of accidents overall since the cameras were introduced.

John Davies, the partnership's project manger, said casualty rates have dropped recently.
He said: "I would hope the fall is because people are slowing down and realising that speed does cause accidents.

"What we have got to remember is cameras are one tool in the tool box in terms of road safety and we need to look at putting all the solutions together."

Last week the Evening Post revealed how the number of speed cameras – including fixed and mobile sites – in the county is around the 360 mark.

The full article contains 514 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 May 2008 9:51 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Long live speed limits,

Fylde 16/05/2008 17:47:11
Don't speed and you won't get fined - why are the people in the road lobby too thick to understand this?
2

nh2,

18/05/2008 10:23:44
There is no evidence that speed camera actually reduce speed. They MAY just at the point of the camera itself, but not before the camera. Take for example Blackpool Road at Moore Park, heading west. I've witnessed cars at very high speed (60 mph) and even multiple cars chasing each other, and only to brake slightly at the speed camera, which never actually flashes them as the speed camera is point uphill to the east where cars are much less likely to be actually speeding.
3

Fast Driver,

Preston 18/05/2008 17:42:27
The Department of Transport's own study into the causes of vehicular accidents on the country's roads attributes approximately 5% to exceeding the speed limit (Source: Select Committee on Transport - Minutes of Evidence 15th January 2007). The vast majority by far (approximately 50%) are caused by driver inattention. In other words, it is the general standard of driving that needs to be improved. Alas, that is hardly likely to happen when traffic cops (who can observe poor driving) are being replaced by speed cameras. The current plateau in accident statistics (they are no longer going down!) can quite reasonably be attributed to the recent proliferation of speed cameras.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.