Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Saturday, 10th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Please don't demolish our homes'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
01 November 2008
Distraught tenants at a block of Lancashire flats spoke of their anger after plans to bulldoze their homes to make way for a city centre regeneration were unveiled.
Flats in Carlisle Street, Preston, which have been standing for more than 20 years, are to be razed to allow a road to be widened as part of the £700m Tithebarn rebirth.

But upset residents, many of them elderly, say the upheaval will wreck their lives.

In an emotional plea to council bosses, one said: "Please would you consider widening the road a few yards to the other side to save our homes?

"None of us want to move. We are all happy and settled and don't want to move."

Residents at all 10 Carlisle Street flats, including several in their 80s and one 94-year-old, have written letters to Preston Council pleading with them to change the plans.

It comes as the Lancashire Evening Post reveals that 16 separate objections have already been received over the regeneration, with eight objectors enlisting solicitors to act for them.

Stephen Corless, 43, a full time carer for his girlfriend Susan Bridge, 42, who suffers from epilepsy, moved to Carlisle Street to be close to the city centre.

He said: "No one wants to move, we don't want to go back to living in rough areas. We like our neighbours and we want to stay together.

"There is a 94-year-old woman here, it is not fair to ask a woman in her 90s to move.

"Why can't they extend the road the other way and leave us alone?"

Grandfather Gordon Curwen, 74, a retired Preston dock worker, was the first tenant to move into Carlisle Street when the flats were built in the 1970s.

He said the Community Gateway Association, which owns the flats, only renovated them two years ago.

He added: "We're all elderly people on this road.

"When they were doing the houses up, that was upheaval and there were a couple of people who were really ill.

"Now they have all been done up, they are going to knock them down."

In an impassioned letter to the council, Carlisle Street resident Dorothy Pearson said: "I am very worried about where I will end up living.

"My neighbours and I are very settled here. Most of my neighbours are elderly and I don't think they could stand another move."

Mike Brogan, assistant director of city projects at Preston Council, said: "If it gets planning approval, it will move into the potential Compulsory Purchase Order stage.
"But before we have CPOs, things are preferably done by negotiation.

"The developers will either need to relocate people or pay them appropriate monies if they can't."

A total of 16 residents and businesses have so far registered formal objections to the Tithebarn scheme.

>> Iconic club faces bulldozer



>> Vote in our latest web poll

Preston and Proud

The full article contains 484 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 November 2008 7:20 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
2
1

Dave Thorp,

Preston 01/11/2008 11:15:27
Yet more victims of the tithebarn nonsense. When is the council going to realise that not one resident of Preston actually wants this development and it is going to cause more hassle than it is worth.

Obviously Community Gateway Association will rehouse the affected if their homes are knocked down but that will put further strain on their incredibly long waiting list and wouldn't need to be the case if the council simply listens to what the public wants. Presumably the council will also be compensating CGA for the improvements carried out to these properties that could well end up having been a waste of time.

I can't wait for the next string of local elections as if the current councillors wont listen to what people want it is time to make way for some who will!
2

River,

01/11/2008 14:58:13
Working class pensioners don't fit in with our council's 'vision' for the city centre. Their views just don't count as they won't be visiting the flashy new shops to buy Gucci shoes and designer sunglasses.
That's why the council is downgrading our bus station and moving it further away from the city centre - bus passengers, pensioners, people who can't 'splash the cash' will be no longer welcome in the City.
Kicking these people out of their homes is just another part of the 'social cleansing' of our city centre.
We will be left with a flashy fantasy city centre, surrounded by disintegrating neglected estates - the council has forgotten that it's first duty is to ordinary Preston people.
3

Sam Tana,

01/11/2008 16:39:26
+1 River.
Makes me wonder just who will be able to go shoe and sunglasses shopping. Cars will be banned and the bus and rail stations are miles apart and a good walk from the shops. Not ideal for all the designer darlings they seem to be aiming to attract.
4

Cammy,

Avenham 02/11/2008 10:14:35
River, why are you assuming that the pensioners are working class?

I believe that the council's duty is first and foremost to council tax payers. Yes, those people who have paid towards services. No doubt you would argue that these pensioners have "paid into the system" all their working lives. Before you do so have a thought for the middle class pensioners who paid in far more only to see their savings being penalised so they qualify for less state assistance.

Why should progress be stalled because of a few pensioners who might not even be around when Tithebarn is built. If we ran all our services according to the needs of pensioners then Preston would be left even further behind compared to Manchester and Liverpool.
5

Dave Thorp,

Preston 02/11/2008 11:51:53
So Cammy, it is right to demolish a 94 year old ladies home and force her to move home all in the name of progress is it?
6

Cammy,

Avenham 02/11/2008 13:07:30
Okay Dave T you have convinced me. The concerns of a few obstinate pensioners far outweigh the possible benefits. Preston Council must cancel this massive jobs creation scheme and capital investment programme. So for all you unemployed construction workers out there I am afraid you might have to look elsewhere for your next job. Preston must not build the Tithebarn!
7

Dave Thorp,

Preston 02/11/2008 13:35:14
They could have used more people like you around in colonial times you know!
8

River,

02/11/2008 15:25:30
According to the people living in the street, all it would take is a rubber and a few new pencil lines - changing the plans to widen the street on the other side, rather than at the expense of their homes.

This sounds eminently sensible, if the scheme was to be designed for the benefit of the ordinary people of Preston. However the scheme is designed for the benefit of the developers, and these people's faces just don't fit in with the developer's vision - and yes it is because they are working class people, living in housing association property, rather than young professionals living in private 'egg box' apartments.
9

Liss,

Preston 02/11/2008 15:26:42
Please, do you know where I can find more information about this story? Thank you
10

barnfarm,

02/11/2008 17:59:30
Common decency must bow before the profit motive! Some empty 'urban living flats' must replace those occupied grannie flats forthwith! How else is Preston to offer meaningful investment opportunities to the rentier class of South East England?
Cammy's vision of the future: a designer boot stamping on a human face for eternity.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.