Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Saturday, 10th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Family village' could still be built



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
30 October 2008
An historic Lancashire building seems certain to be turned into a home for one of the city's wealthiest families.
Multi-millionaire Yousuf Bhailok has said he expects to be successful in his appeal to Local Government Secretary Hazel Blears over the rejection of his plan to turn the Harris Knowledge Park into 11 homes for his 17 family members.

But the imminent lifting of a moratorium restricting housing development, which was central to the case for throwing out the scheme, opens the way for work to begin.

In a behind-closed-doors briefing on Monday, Preston Council's planning committee is expected to be told that the owner would be free to press ahead with plans if the moratorium is lifted – even if his appeal is unsuccessful.

If it fails, the lack of a moratorium would mean Mr Bhailok could submit a new application which could not be blocked on the same grounds.

Mr Bhailok said: "I assume that any policy changes over the moratorium will affect the council's stance.

"I have always believed that we have a very strong case for appeal and with the moratorium lifted, I do not believe the council has a leg to stand on.

"I want to restore the building back to its original use as a family home; this is a restoration not a development, it had a family atmosphere when it was an orphanage and that is what I want to bring back."

However, the council could impose strict conditions on what kind of development Mr Bhailok would be allowed to carry out if a new application was submitted for the site on Garstang Road, Fulwood.

It is unlikely to have such control if the appeal, a date for which is yet to be set, is successful.

Council principal planning officer David Linley confirmed that the housing moratorium was "the main reason" for the rejection earlier this year.

He said that the new North West Regional Spatial Strategy published last month said Preston would have to build 507 homes a year rather than the previous target of 180 homes.

Mr Linley said: "From this we have put together a new draft policy which is due to be considered by the cabinet in November.

"If it is, the appeal could be considered in the light of the new policy."

Last year, the owner said he wanted to turn homes in the Grade II-listed park into "a village green-style" complex.

>> Council can buy Harris Park for £6.5m



>> Vote in our latest web poll

Preston and Proud

The full article contains 427 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 October 2008 3:17 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

mrsel,

preston 31/10/2008 10:30:16
I am hearing all the "right" words such as restoration not development but as this debate goes on do we really want a "closed to the outside world" village deep in the heart of Fulwood? The traffic around there is bad enough without adding cars toing and froing from behind the gates day and night. Fulwood used to be a lovely place. this is not an asset to Fulwood at all, it is unwanted and will not enhamce the area at all. Dress it up with the right words as much as you like but the reality is it will be a closed to the outside world community who will develop the site however they want once they are in situ. No racist feeling from this post at all just simple common sense.
2

Quirky,

31/10/2008 10:44:51
This is all wrong. Why would anybody want to build an enclave in the middle of Fulwood?
3

,

31/10/2008 18:31:54
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
4

Mr Smith,

Preston 31/10/2008 18:56:17
You guys need to move on from the whole mosque business. I'm aware there are a lot of old fashioned stuck up people living in Fulwood who are very resistant to change but change happens everywhere. Every time there is a mention of any development they come on here and a good and proper moaning session. The hospital car park plans are a good example.
5

preston lassie,

31/10/2008 21:13:34
a village,yes right,what is preston becoming,it should not be aloud. people with money can buy anything,it is disgusting
6

preston lassie,

31/10/2008 21:15:27
and anyway,people in fulwood are not stuck up.JUST NORMAL PEOPLE
7

,

31/10/2008 22:53:36
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
8

mrsel,

preston 01/11/2008 09:59:53
Lots of the plans are great on paper but the reality of them is the issue. The road infrastructures around Preston cannot cope with the current traffic so when all the new houses on the old hospital are sold it will be even worse. Get real the Harris is a cost effective way for a wealthy family to create a little village closed to the outside world. Chances are in less than 10 years there will be more properties built on the site for the extended family and the original building will then be requested to change to a place of worship. I would put money on this being part of the long term plan. I for one, who may be a stuck up resident of Fulwood, would have much more respect for the gentleman involved if he simply put his cards on the table and said he wanted to create a closed environment for his family and extended family and that the Harris site is no longer anything to do with the people of Preston. Money clearly buys you anything.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.