Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Damaging' buildings in Preston



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 September 2008
Planning chiefs blame the 1960s and 1970s for many of the most unsightly developments in Preston city centre.
They have compiled a list of buildings as "damaging" because they don't fit in with their surroundings.

And they recommend Preston Council should consider redeveloping the sites if the opportunity arises.

These buildings were all erected before a conservation zone was first introduced to protect the area in 1984.

CRYSTAL HOUSE replaced the old Town Hall when it was demolished in 1962 following a blaze many years earlier.

Planners have slated the fact the tower block is taller than surrounding buildings and have branded it "mundane", though they say a £4m make-over to convert it into shops and flats has improved its appearance.

The INDOOR MARKET has also been singled out for criticism by planners behind the report.

They reckon it is too close to the covered market and that the steps from the first floor get in the way of market shoppers and pedestrians. Entrance ways have also been branded "dark and uninviting".

Replacing traditional buildings and narrowing the gap between shops on LIVERPOOL STREET and the covered market has created a "gloomy, enclosed space", planners say. The changes went ahead because the area was outside the protection of the first conservation zone.

LOWTHIAN HOUSE also comes under fire for not blending in with its surroundings. Planners described the dreary office block as too tall and "not relating in its materials or detailing" to anything around it.

The GUILD HALL is the final building to be listed as having "an adverse impact" on the area.

Planners say it is a "striking" building but reckon the materials used to build it and the design don't fit in with buildings on either side and opposite the venue.

>> Conservation area worth preserving

>> Which buildings in Preston should be protected?

strong>See our special picture spread on this feature in Monday's Lancashire Evening Post

>> Vote on Preston's most unsightly building or area

i-map

The full article contains 332 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 September 2008 2:09 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

River,

08/09/2008 17:54:34
What an absolutely amazing coincidence that most of the buildings named here will be redeveloped as part of the Tithebarn scheme.
2

CaptainJason,

08/09/2008 18:12:19
No coincidence, there just eyesores. Dont forget St Johns, thats also biting the dust.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.