Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Lancashire Evening Post CTY site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Waste plant 'is a big monstrosity'



View Video
Download Video

Video

Take a virtual tour of the planned waste site
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 27 August 2008
A controversial £40m waste centre, plans for which prompted a long legal battle, is now taking shape in Leyland.
And residents of Bispham Avenue, Thornton Drive and Fylde Avenue say work so far on the imposing Lancashire Waste Technology Park has already lived up to their worst fears.

The facility, being built by Global Renewables in partnership with Lancashire County Council, is on the former Leyland Trucks test track site and will be the size of 14 football pitches. It is set to be operational by the summer of 2010.

Residents Against Waste Site (RAWS) fought the scheme, only admitting defeat in 2007 when they lost a judicial review against LCC's decision to approve the scheme.

Now, they say, the consequences of that defeat are hitting home.

Pensioners Eileen and Ron Oates have lived in Bispham Avenue for more than 32 years and say they're devastated about the impact the building has had on their home.

Mrs Oates said: "We used to enjoy views over Winter Hill and to Brinscall but now all we can see is a great big monstrosity.

"We have been promised trees will be planted to camouflage the buildings, but the structure goes right up to the boundary so there won't be room to plant them."

The waste plant will be the size of 14 football pitches and will accept waste from across Lancashire.

Mother-of-two Sue McDonough has lived in Bispham Avenue for 14 years and said she was surprised at how quickly the building had gone up, adding: "My own view is that this is the wrong location for it."

Farington East councillor Mike Otter of South Ribble Council, has been helping residents trying to get compensation. He said: "The residents have a good argument but nobody seems to be listening."

A joint statement from Global Renewables and LCC said: "In order to mitigate for the visual impacts of the waste facility, a number of features were included within the design.

"We are also working with local residents to provide additional screening onto the existing mound adjacent to the River Lostock, with the goodwill of the landowner.

"Community meetings hosted by Lancashire County Council and Global Renewables are a chance for residents to raise concerns and receive updates on the progress of the facility. We do our best to answer questions and take action to address concerns whenever possible."

>> Hundreds march against rubbish tip (with protest video)

>> Vote in our latest web poll

i-map

The full article contains 416 words and appears in Lancashire Evening Post CTY newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 27 August 2008 8:01 AM
  • Source: Lancashire Evening Post CTY
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

barnfarm,

27/08/2008 11:07:58
One of the fishier planning stitch-ups of recent times in these parts, that's my humble opin. Big business and 'democracy' working in sweet harmony to thwart fair play.
2

K Darragh,

leyland 27/08/2008 14:45:14
Why does some geek always work out the size of something in football pitch criteria??
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.