DCSIMG

Why register?

CloseX

If you have not signed up previously

It's free and only takes a minute!
Benefits to registering with us
comment on storiesComment on stories
Customise daily e-mail newslettersCustomise daily e-mail newsletters
Arrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions onlineArrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions online
Offers, promotions and deals from partnersOffers, promotions and deals from partners
Add/claim your business on Find itAdd/claim your business on Find it
true
  • 26/05/13
  • 8°C to 15°C Sunny spells
  • Preston 5-day weather forecast

    CloseX

    Monday 27 May

    Light rain

    Temp

    High14°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From South

    Speed20 mph

    Tuesday 28 May

    Light rain

    Temp

    High13°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed13 mph

    Wednesday 29 May

    Cloudy

    Temp

    High14°c

    Low10°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed16 mph

    Thursday 30 May

    Sunny

    Temp

    High15°c

    Low10°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed18 mph

    Friday 31 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High15°c

    Low9°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed17 mph

  • Follow us
  • Place your Ad
  • Subscribe

Pollution from fracking ‘is unlikely’

plans: Shale gas extraction is set for the county

plans: Shale gas extraction is set for the county

It is “extremely unlikely” that ground water supplies would be polluted by methane as a result of controversial “fracking” for shale gas, UK geologists said today.

And although the process, which uses high-pressure liquid pumped deep underground to fracture shale rock and release gas, caused two earthquakes in Lancashire last year, they were too small to cause damage, they said.

Campaigners have called for a moratorium on fracking in the UK in the face of the earthquakes and amid fears it could lead to pollution of drinking water by methane gas or chemicals in the liquid used in the process.

Fracking has proved controversial in the US, where shale gas is already being exploited on a large scale and where footage has been captured of people able to set fire to the water coming out of their taps as a result of gas contamination.

But Professor Mike Stephenson, of the British Geological Survey, said most geologists thought it was a “pretty safe activity” and the risks associated with it were low. He said the distance between groundwater supplies around 40-50 metres below the surface and the deep sources of gas in the shale a mile or two underground, made it unlikely methane would leak into water as a result of fracking.

“Most geologists are pretty convinced that it is extremely unlikely contamination would occur,” he said.

There was no evidence in peer-reviewed literature of pollution of water by methane as a result of fracking, he said.

He also added that the presence of the gas in US water supplies was likely to be natural.

But a survey was currently being conducted in the UK, to establish a baseline of any gas naturally found in groundwater before drilling took place.

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page