Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Which buildings in Preston should be protected?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
08 September 2008
Council leader Ken Hudson will admit Preston city centre has its share few eyesore buildings.
Built in 1962 to replace the old town hall, the much-maligned Crystal House, before its recent makeover, was long dubbed a blot on the urban landscape it shares with the listed Harris Museum and Miller Arcade.

While planning officers can't undo mistakes from the past, they can act to preserve the best buildings from bygone eras – and stop more eyesores taking root beside our landmark buildings.

That's the idea behind a new plan to extend a city centre conservation zone, which already takes in the Harris Museum, Town Hall, Sessions House and Cenotaph.

Conservation zones make it more difficult for developers to push through plans for new buildings which would be out of keeping with the look of historic areas.

Coun Hudson says: "In retrospect, we would not have had those buildings (like Crystal House) but we have got them.

"What we want to ensure it does not happen again.

"Conservation zones mean people have got to give some thought to any development they envisage. And it gives us as a council more control over the type of development that is going to go up.

"Whatever development takes place in that area, it's got to be sympathetic to the rich heritage of the city of Preston.

"Without being controversial, we don't want another Crystal House."

Currently, the Market Square conservation zone's boundaries stretch from the indoor market in the north, Lancaster Road in the east, to Fishergate and Church Street in the south and on the west by part of Friargate.

Planning chiefs believe that should be extended to include both sides of Friargate and Cheapside, where some buildings date back to the late 16th and early 17th centuries.

The public will soon be asked what buildings and features they think should receive greater protection. Questionnaires will drop through letterboxes and go online at the city council's website.

It's been more than a decade since residents were last allowed to have their say on planning laws for the area so people are being urged to grasp the chance to comment.

After all, it could help define our city centre landscape for years to come.

>> 'Damaging' buildings in Preston

>> Conservation area worth preserving

See our special picture spread on this feature in Monday's Lancashire Evening Post

>> Vote on Preston's most unsightly building or area

i-map

The full article contains 406 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 September 2008 2:08 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
2
1

barnfarm,

08/09/2008 12:44:57
Guild Hall should go. Looks like a drunk's been let loose with a giant cacky-coloured lego set.
2

jonh,

08/09/2008 12:50:19
And it can take the St John Centre & the Bus Station with it.
3

barnfarm,

08/09/2008 13:44:32
I deg to biffer. St John can go, but the bus station should be turned into a giant Lazer Quest. With a lido on the top deck.
4

Beverley Kirwan,

Preston 08/09/2008 14:10:00
All those awful warehouse type breeze block shops e.g. Aldi, Blockbusters should never have been allowed. Plus all those big ugly things opposite the new courts. Yuk!
5

MickG,

Mumbai 08/09/2008 16:03:53
Preserving buildings is not the issue here. Approving ugly buildings is. Preston Council needs to take responsibility for all the rubbish it has approved.

As a modern city we need to encourage future development it's good for jobs and it's good for the city's image. All we need to do is make sure the designs of these new buildings are good.

By encouraging modern architecture that stands the test of time the council could go some way to redeeming its past mistakes.
6

PW,

Preston 08/09/2008 16:18:08
The bus station `works` and holds many memories for many people. If it was `cleaned` and improved it would be fine for another hundred years.
7

Ribbleton,

Preston 08/09/2008 16:40:50
The bus station doesnt work. Not as a bus station as it belongs in the era when architects thought bus passengers should go down holes in the ground (subways). To clean it, make it comply with disability legislation etcetera would cost millions. All to have a bus station twice as big as needed and that passengers avoid using. The debate on the bus station is over. You lost.
8

David C,

08/09/2008 16:59:18
The Bus Station does work. Ribbleton, tell me how you work away around this situation. Preston Bus, Stagecoach (both at wars), First Buses, J Fishwick, Blue Bus, Burnley and Pendle, Blackpool Transport, and National express to name a few. Tell me how they fit into the New Bus Station, tell me how to resolve the issue of Bay Blocking, the issue of Hundreds in 1 bay for the 17 services that use it. There is only the curent Station that can cope with that pressure. If they can build a station of the same size anywere else so that the current transport situation works in it, then I say yes knock it down. But they can't so now people will head for the cars even more. The new station won't work and in a few years time Ibe the first to say TOLD YOU SO. Places like Manchester, Liverpool, Blackpool etc would love a station like Preston has. The one thing everyone has forgotten with the new station disign is the Bus Wars. But hey there is a pie in the sky tram system they want. So Ribbleton how does the new one work?
9

River,

08/09/2008 17:57:16
The bus station should definitely stay, and be done up so that it is a prestigious destination - this will help to reverse attitudes that see public transport as 'second class'.

Preston needs to INCREASE, not reduce it's public transport capacity if we're to break out of traffic gridlock and reduce our carbon footprint - this means not downgrading our bus station.
10

River,

08/09/2008 18:00:21
I'd like to see a day when our bus stations are done up to the same standard as our airports - then we will know that national and local government take public transport seriously.

Instead we're being palmed off with a smaller bus station further from the city centre. Clearly bus users are not welcome in the Tithebarn 'vision' for Preston.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.