Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Square's 'daft' design plan is changed



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
14 October 2008
The designs were branded as "daft" and "self indulgent" and now people power has prompted radical changes to the controversial revamp of Preston's historic Winckley Square.
Plans to suspend metal letters in the trees in the Victorian square have been scrapped in the face of public pressure.

But councillors have voted unanimously in favour of the rest of the plan being moved forward and a planning application for the £3m scheme is due to be submitted in March.

Mike Brogan, assistant director of city projects, said the metal letters had been removed and the "performance area" would be a public space rather than a stage, which could be used for bands and plays.

Mr Brogan said: "The artwork was quite badly criticised – the big letters. We've removed that.

"The big mistake we made was writing 'performance area'. It isn't a performance area as such – it's a hard surface you can use for a variety of things."

When plans for the metal letters were unveiled, Aiden Turner Bishop, from the Preston and South Ribble Civic Trust, branded the idea "daft" and "self-indulgent".

Coun Bhikhu Patel, a member of the council's city centre committee, said: "People see this as our heritage and our history and they don't want that changed."

In the meantime, council bosses will need to iron out the ownership of the square to allow them to obtain the necessary funding from the North West Development Agency.

Currently, the council owns just half of the square, with the rest split between five other owners – the Trustees for Roman Catholic Purposes; Burrow, Muir, Bretherton and Cocker; Blackthorn Homes; Plazzania Limited and Lancashire Probation and Aftercare Limited.

The fear is that any one of these parties could give the council notice at any time and fence off their part of the square.

Mr Brogan said: "They could give us six months notice and say 'I want my land back'.

"That ownership issue needs to be resolved whether this scheme goes ahead or not. We need to speak to those people because it's in their interest."

>> View a slideshow relating to this story

>> Vote in our latest web poll

i-map

The full article contains 363 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 October 2008 7:47 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

nvr2old,

Preston 14/10/2008 09:57:02
£3 million? The council should focus on completing the Avenham Park refurbs before starting anything new. The path down past the Belvedere to the Tram bridge is now worse than before the "improvements".
2

barnfarm,

14/10/2008 12:50:51
Right, so because the design is no longer downright idiotic it is somehow magically not wasteful?
This doesn't need doing. Drainage work, path repairs and more attention from the council parkies would do wonders. But obviously, there won't be a big chunk of public money for the private sector in that...
3

River,

14/10/2008 17:17:12
The councillors have backed the plans unanimously.

"When everyone agrees, its a sign noone is thinking" - we need a few councillors with brains, and a few with backbones. Perhaps then we'd get some decent decision making.
4

Caroline B.,

14/10/2008 20:30:13
At least, the letters have been scrapped. Judging by the postings on this site, there were more against the new design rather than for. So why have the plans been backed unanimously? Does nobody listen anymore? As post 1 says, concentrate on Avenham park before embarking on spending even more taxpayers' money.
5

Eric Cartman,

Preston 15/10/2008 04:00:23
River sweetheart, I really wish you'd run for Preston MP as an independent. You'd swipe the floor with the rubbish we have now.
6

jonh,

15/10/2008 07:31:37
Eric, if you really belive that, then you want Preston to rot back to the 19th century.
7

Prionmonkey,

15/10/2008 12:31:16
Just leave the thing alone. Sort out the drainage, forget the bland corporation art and ludicrous water feature, even forget the performance area.
It's a rare bit of green space with mature trees.
The self-indulgent councillors should stop trying to "make their mark on the city" and save OUR money for summat useful
8

tonyjames,

17/10/2008 10:19:21
"The big mistake we made was writing 'performance area'. It isn't a performance area as such – it's a hard surface you can use for a variety of things."
......Such as...
Drinking, skating, smoking dope and generally hanging round. Should be a nice little area for the local grunge kids and wasters then. Nice one!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.