Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 25th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Shocking new figures on truancy



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Almost 5,000 children across Lancashire are missing huge chunks of school, new figures have revealed.
Thousands of the county's secondary school pupils are missing more than a fifth of the school year and have been classed as "persistently" absent by the Government.

And Preston ranks among the county's worst performers, with more than one in 10 sc
hool children regularly failing to turn up for classes.

The shock statistics were revealed this week by the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF).

Community leaders have said the findings were "not good enough".

In total, 6.9% of secondary school youngsters across the county
– around 4,800 pupils – missed more than 20% last school year, due to issues like truancy and holidays.

Chorley MP Lindsay Hoyle, who asked for the figures, said: "It is not acceptable, that is the truth of the matter.

"What is going to be done to bring the figures down and what can we do to ensure this does not continue?

"That is what we need to be looking at."

Coun Ken Hudson, leader of Preston Council, said: "It is certainly not good enough and it is something that Lancashire County Council and school governors should be addressing."

Lancaster and Wyre and South Ribble have the county's lowest levels of absenteeism.

The figures relate to all the county's state secondary schools – including maintained schools, city academies and city technology colleges.

Ken Cridland, secretary of the National Union of Teachers in Lancashire, said high-pressure testing regimes were leading youngsters to "fall out of love with learning".

But he added: "In Preston one of the factors which has been mentioned quite often by teachers is there are some people of different ethnic origins who take their children off abroad for quite a considerable time. That could distort the figures."

A 'persistent absentee' is defined by the DCSF as a pupil missing more than 63 sessions in the year – typically missing more than 20% of the school year.

Across England, the number of persistent secondary absentees is around 7% – meaning seven areas of Lancashire are above the national average.

But Coun Vali Patel, cabinet member for schools at Lancashire County Council, said Lancashire was performing well compared to the national average.

He said: "We take pupil attendance very seriously and have accessed DCSF support and limited additional funding to target a small number of schools where persistent absenteeism has been identified as a particular concern."

In 2005, LCC announced that parents whose children persistently play truant would face fixed penalty notices as part of plans to get tough on the problem.

That followed truancy officers in Lancashire being given lessons from police in how to caution parents who let their kids bunk off school.

And last year it was announced Preston schools would be among a selection of schools with a hardcore of truants to pilot a text messaging system to stop kids bunking off.

Preston's Christ the King Catholic High School, Tulketh Community Sports College and Corpus Christi Catholic Sports College were among those involved.



The full article contains 512 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 May 2008 9:54 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

time for action,

16/05/2008 22:01:36

Last week I saw a couple of kids smoking, texting, and kicking a ball round the park when they should have been at school.

I asked one of them why they were not at school. He said: "lyk y go 2 skwl m8 dey dont teach us nuffin wat we dont know alredy neway lyk da techers r all lyk d**keds innit im lyk roflmao dey chat sh*t"

That's it then. Problem solved. No point in children of such eloquence going to school in the first place. Just stay home and chill wiv da parents and lern from dem innit.
2

Laura Collins,

SE 17/05/2008 12:39:40
Truancy: The root of all school safety problems!

“No child falls through the cracks. They are dropped through or shoved through by lazy, emotionally immature adults and unethical professionals”

After the Columbine shootings I made this statement during an interview on national television. The reporter asked if I really believed that statement and I replied, “absolutely!”

But you may ask what this statement has to do with the issue of truancy? Simple, truant children – who are routinely late or absent – come from dysfunctional homes. Those homes in my experience are lead by caregivers who are more concerned about their own pleasures and convenience than the welfare of their children. Some may say that this is an unkind assessment. My response to them is simple, visit these homes and you will see that this is not an aberration.

While some caregivers have a difficult time because of poverty, work schedules or transitioning to a single parent household; the majority simply refuse to exercise self control or basic order in their homes.


And this assessment is supported by various national studies. Research from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention and the U.S. Department of Education have found that child neglect and family disorganization are major factors in truancy. The OJJDP also found that “Truancy has been clearly identified as one of the early warning signs of students headed for potential delinquent activity, social isolation, or educational failure via suspension, expulsion, or dropping out.”
More disturbing is a document that I have used for many years in criminal profiling, the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol (J-SOAP-II). In this well respected assessment tool, caregiver issues and truancy become connected as impetuses for teen sex offender development:

• Inconstant and instable caregivers before the age of 10. Multiple changes in caregivers and living situations.
• Chronic truancy, fighting with peers
3

time for action,

19/05/2008 16:57:50

#2: Eh?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.