Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 9th February 2010

Row over council workers' free parking

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 February 2008
More than 600 Preston council workers are continuing to park for free despite everyone else having to fork out up to £8 a day.
Council bosses have said the workers are likely to continue receiving the perk at least until the Tithebarn regeneration becomes a reality in at least six years time.

Now calls have been made to scrap the perk at a time when taxpayers are having to pay more. Critics of free parking for workers say charging them for car parking could help plug the £1m budget black hole.

The authority could rake in almost £520,000 a year if the 640 employees who get free parking permits were made to pay the same rate as everyone else.

That would be enough to wipe out half the savings needed, protecting jobs and halting the proposed axing of the Passport to Leisure, keeping cemetery charges down and stopping reductions in community grants - just some of the things facing the chop in 2008/9.

Two years ago the cost of parking in some city car parks rose 30 per cent from £1 to £1.30 for between one to two hours.

Two years earlier, the council, in line with the rest of Lancashire, got tough on drivers who overstayed their welcome by employing a team of traffic wardens to monitor the car parks and streets.

Lancashire County Council is set to begin charging its employees to park on its car parks from April as part of a huge package of budget cuts announced last year, although this move has proved unpopular with staff and unions.

Already some county council staff working in Preston city centre must pay for a permit to park in city council car parks.

And staff at the Royal Preston Hospital have been paying to park at work for years.

But 550 Preston Council employees are given permits for free parking at the bus station car park, while a further 90 park for nothing at the Market Hall car park.

Tulketh ward Labour Coun Robert Boswell said it is an issue his group is planning to look at the issue.

He added: "It is an archiac thing as far as I am concerned. It would bring a lot of money in but you can't just change people's terms of employment, it would need to be negotiated."

Liberal Democrat group leader Danny Gallagher said: "I think if there is a saving to be made we should look at it.

"I would encourage most employees if they can to use public transport or another mode of transport such as cycling."

Charging the 550 employees using the Bus station car park for a £195 per quarter Monday to Friday season ticket, the council could make a further £429,000, while the 90 employees paying £245 per quarter on the Market Hall car park would raise another £88,200.

Councillors have 44 parking passes, but they would likely claim any parking changes back through their expenses.

Resources portfolio holder Coun Eric Fazackerley said: "This is something I looked into years ago on the basis of seeing why we gave these permits.
"As I understand it, it is subject to conditions of employment and is an issue with unions."

No one from the Preston Council Unison office was available to comment.
A council spokesman said: "Like many other councils and businesses, the city council provides free parking to employees.

"Many employees working at depots around the city are able to park at their place of work. Other employees, based in the city centre, park in council owned car parks."

However, the spokesman added that the parking permit scheme could be reviewed in the future anyway because the demand for parking spaces is likely to rocket as the Tithebarn Regeneration Project comes to fruition.

>> Vote in our latest web poll

Traffic & travel

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 February 2008 10:26 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

s2,

15/02/2008 10:47:34
if hospital workers - those people who save lives, have to pay to park at work why dont council workers - who lets face it arent exactly saving lives, get away with free parking.
in an ideal world no workers should have to pay to park at work but why should council tax payers effectivly have to foot the bill for council workers to park?
2

B1,

preston 15/02/2008 11:24:13
I was under the impression that all perks had a value and are taxable, I know mine are.
3

,

15/02/2008 11:45:53
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
4

Tallula,

Preston 15/02/2008 12:32:13
This just can not be justified. We are all having to pay higher taxes to pay salaries that are on average £250 month in the public sector than in the private sector, huge pension schemes and now we find out we are funding free car parking! And all at a time when in the private sector we have to accept that we can't have pay rises due to an economic downturn.

All this because everytime the govt try to change anything the public sector goes on strike and because they are seen as 'essential workers' the govt gives in. Well private sector workers are also essential. How about supermarket and petrol station staff go on strike to force the public sector to accept the terms the private sector employed tax payers find acceptable. I can't imagine they would last long without these apparently non-essential workers.
5

PNEEssex,

16/02/2008 00:34:34
It's a matter of employment law. If free parking is part of their contract of employment, it would be illegal to remove this perk unilaterally; it would have to be negotiated. This legal protection applies whether we're public or private sector employees. If it is a benefit in kind (which it is) it should be declared on a tax return and taxed.
6

Tallula,

16/02/2008 16:43:38
Re. employment Law
Although in the private sector what actually happens is that the employer 'consults' (tells the employees what is going to change), the employees have no choice but to accept or leave because they generally can't go on strike and the terms are changed.

I know someone currently who is provided with accommodation as part of their retail employment, they have been told that the company can no longer afford this and so the benefit is been removed, they are not receiving a pay rise. Imagine this happening in the public sector!

This is just one example of employment in the private sector - it's about time the council workers realised they can't just expect taxpayers to keep paying more and strike when they don't like changes that need to be made in order to prevent service cuts.
7

councilboy,

23/02/2008 20:52:26
Once again council workers are expected to work for nothing and be grateful. I have a wide circle of friends in the private sector and I am the lowest paid of the lot. In fact quite a few have retired on larger pensions than Im earning.

So why cant we have perks in other areas?

As for car parking costing the taxpayer, It doesnt cost anything, any maintenance will be minimal. This is just an exercise to raise money on the backs of the workers.

I know hospital staff have to pay but surely the answer to this is that they shouldnt have to pay.
Many of the private sector have car parking spaces.
Just look at the retail parks, staff have free parking you can bet the cost (again minimal)will be passed on to the consumer.

Many council workers use the cars for work and consequently will claim this cost back, thus additional cost for the tax payer.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.