Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Road campaigner slammed by judge



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 August 2008
A battling grandmother has failed in a High Court bid to have the controversial M6 Heysham Link road thrown out.
Linda Davies, of Russell Drive, Torrisholme, got legal aid to try and overturn Seceratry of State Hazel Blears' decision to sanction the £138m road.

She wanted to prevent the road being built on greenbelt land which runs behind her home.

But the judge, Sir Jeremy Sullivan, threw the challenge out on Friday after a one and a half day hearing and is now set to recommend a change in the law to prevent such challenges delaying important public schemes.

Mr Justice Sullivan said there was no merit in the challenge.

Jeremy Pike, for Mrs Davies' lawyers EarthRights, argued that the road's environmental assessment was inadequate and that a park-and-ride to be built close to junction 34 was not subject to the same investigation.

He further argued concerns over a bridge over the River Lune being in a flood plain had not been addressed.

Mrs Davies, a retired social worker and former teacher at Lancaster and Morecambe College who has lived in Torrisholme for 40 years, is now considering whether to lodge an appeal.

The link road has been beseiged by controversy since it was first touted. At a planning inquiry at the Holiday Inn in Lancaster last year campaigners said it would destroy miles of greenbelt.

The Environmental and Sustainable Transport Alliance (ESTA) and local campaigners Transport Solutions for Lancaster and Morecambe (TSLM) said the bypass "would not provide a long-term solution to the traffic problems of the area and would be severely damaging to local communities in a variety of ways," which includes "noise, air pollution, increased flood risk, loss of visual amenity, and severance".

But Government planning inspector Christopher Tipping recommended planning permission be granted for the completion of the link road along the northern route in February this year after the lengthy inquiry.

The route will link junction 34 of the M6 with the eastern end of the existing link road, opened in 1994.

Despite that, campaign groups have continued to pin their hopes on the fact that the Department for Transport is yet to approve funding for the scheme.

>> Vote in our latest web poll

i-map

Lancashire County Council hopes to start work in January 2010 with a projected finish date of 2012.

The full article contains 394 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 August 2008 8:59 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
2
1

K Darragh,

leyland 30/08/2008 01:36:03
Silly woman,i love the open spaces...think this is all about her house value!Progress is here,this has been well planned!I do sympathise though.
2

Kells95e,

preston 30/08/2008 06:56:14
Ex social worker !!! probably chats to "Swampy" on a reguler basis and reads the "Guardian"
As for her lawyers!!!! Earthrights ????
They obviously don't represent BAe then!!
3

River,

30/08/2008 13:15:15
"the judge, Sir Jeremy Sullivan, threw the challenge out on Friday after a one and a half day hearing and is now set to recommend a change in the law to prevent such challenges delaying important public schemes."


God forbid that ordinary people should have the opportunity to challenge the decisions of the authorities through legal means.
4

28,

Preston 30/08/2008 13:39:08
This by-pass should have been built years ago.
5

Beau,

Lancaster 30/08/2008 15:32:15
We wish that they would spend the money instead on congestion busting measures for Lancaster and Morecambe. A package of measures has been worked up but are being quietly ignored by the County Council. They cant afford both.
The MP and the City Council don't support the Link, which isn't a by-pass its a lorry attracting route to Heysham port.
6

Ribbledrivel,

Preston 30/08/2008 19:22:10
Sir Jeremy Sullivan - I think I love you.
Big Jez is an avatar to aheadness - he knows this country needs more roads.
Centuries from now the good folk of Torrisholme will speak his name with hushed reverence.
This road cannot be built quick enough. The countryside it will destroy is ugly and inaccessible.
So what a few nimbys/hippies will lose their homes.
I'm sure the big juicy cheque from the council will hush their moaning mouths.
Three cheers for Big Jez. (If you're ever in the George Hotel mate the drinks are on me)
7

graham nelson,

preston 30/08/2008 19:49:13
and people in preston think our road system is bad. its heaven compared to lancasters.
8

28,

Preston 31/08/2008 11:56:17
Beau, how exactly is this not a by-pass? It provides a link for motorists from the motorway to Morecambe and Heysham, bypassing the heavily congested Lancaster which has a road system more suitable for horse and carriage.

Surely this is the most sensible ‘congestion busting measure’ possible for the area with limited resources.
9

Beau,

Lancaster 31/08/2008 18:55:14
28, the expectation of people who have to put up with the horrific congestion getting into and out of Lancaster to Morecambe is that a bridge to Luneside would be built, the two towns must be connected to the University for us to make the best of regeneration initiatives. Thats the view of many including the majority on the City Council and the MP.
The Heysham M6 Link road is exactly that, its purpose is to give better access to the Heysham ferry. The vast majority of traffic isn't going to the motorway its passing between the two towns.
The cost of the Link is £186 million, the cost of the package of congestion measures estimated at around £92 million.
If we get the Link we will still be stuck in traffic and having spent all that money, you can be sure that the authorities will not be shelling out any more.
So whats the priority more lorries to Heysham or freeing up L&M?
10

28,

Preston 31/08/2008 22:59:22
Beau, if the proposed by-pass is to be used merely by Heysham Port lorries, as you suggested, surely this alone would alleviate some considerable pressure from the central Lancaster roads. Regarding the university, I believe a rail stop would be more suitable than a new road as most students will not own cars. It should be fairly cheap because the line is already there.
Also, you can correct me if I’m wrong, but I suspect that the reason why you object to the proposed road is because you live in the Beaumont area of Lancaster and do not want your quiet corner of the city ruined. However your name could just be a coincidence of course.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.