Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Regional rule by back door' blast



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
13 November 2008
A new regional select committee for the North West will be a "hugely expensive bureaucratic talking shop", it was claimed today.
Lancashire MP Nigel Evans accused ministers of "bringing in regional government via the back door", after the Commons narrowly backed plans to set up eight regional select committees, including one in the North West, at a cost of £2m.

Bodies including the North West Regional Development Agency, the Learning and Skills Council, Strategic Health Authority, Highways Agency and Sport England will all be scrutinised by the committee of MPs sitting six times a year.

Leader of the Commons Harriet Harman said the committees, which would be made up of nine MPs, were needed to "plug the accountability gap".

She has described regional quangos as "big regional beasts" whose directors and chief executives were "regional masters of the universe – with huge budgets."

The new committee was today welcomed by Chorley Labour MP Lindsay Hoyle who said: "I am very pleased. It's something I have been campaigning on since 1997.

"It the best way to make ministers and quangos accountable to Parliament."

But during heated scenes in the Commons a controversial move to pay the chairmen of the new select committees an extra £14,000 a year was rejected by just two votes.

Today Ribble Valley Tory MP Nigel Evans slammed the plans as a waste of money.

He said:"I quite frankly think it is going to be hugely expensive, bureaucratic rubbish. It will be a talking shop."

He and other Conservative MPs believe the government will use the new committees to resurrect the idea of regional government.

The policy was left in tatters after the North East voted against plans for a directly elected regional assembly in a referendum in 2004.

Mr Evans said: "They are trying to get this up and running in order that they do not have to have an English Parliament. It is grossly undemocratic."

Tory former Cabinet minister John Redwood added: "What part of 'no' do you not understand following the referendum result in the North East on elected regional government?

"The people of England do not want to be Balkanised and regionalised at their expense."

A Tory-led move to allow only regional grand committees to be set up was rejected by 250 votes to 233.

MPs voted by 254 to 224 to go ahead with the regional select committees and grand committees for the North West, Yorkshire and Humber, East Midlands, East of England, North East, South East, South West and West Midlands.

>> Vote in our latest web poll

>> Have your say on our special traffic and travel rantline

Traffic & travel

The full article contains 443 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 November 2008 11:38 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Billy J,

Plungi 14/11/2008 10:43:10
How can anyone call this democracy. As John Redwood points out where the electorate were polled on whether they wanted directly elected regional government they said NO. So that idea was scrapped. So instead we are having committees forced on us that do not even draw solely from regional MPs, but can bus in MPs from other regions so the government have a majority on the committee! what?
2

Jack Davenport,

Preston 14/11/2008 14:02:04
Unelected Regional assemblies had been around for a long time (they were actually created thanks to Tory policies). The proposals from the government related to expanding their powers and making them democratically elected. The current system runs under the North West Development Agency, which is unelected.

The idea of a central scrutiny is better, to ensure that they are being run properly and have some democratic accountability. At present there are very little powers for local authorities to have any say over funding. Preston Council used to have better input, but then the Tory and Lib dem councillors recently voted away the council's powers . I wonder if anyone pointed that out to Nigel Evans or John Redwood?

I find it slightly ironic that the Tories are complaining about regionalisation when they were the ones principly responsible for implementing it. They complain about lack of accountability, but then actively campaign against accountability when it is introduced. A mass of contradictions for the Tories.
3

barnfarm,

14/11/2008 14:46:22
Tories def a mass of c*ntradictions, always have been. But if Labour had any real interest in democracy they'd sweep this whole NWDAquango/assembly shambles into the wastebasket of history and return due power and funding to our fully democratic local authorities.
4

Ex Pat in Newcastle,

wallsend 14/11/2008 19:30:55
'Regional rule by back door blast'

Back Door Blast!!! Does anyone else think this sounds a bit rude? What an hilarious headline!
5

Sam Tana,

15/11/2008 16:15:08
Regional rule would be fine, if they then got rid of the duplication of powers in Westminster.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.