Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Questions over care of 'Ribble Piddler'



View Video
Download Video

Video

Reporter Melanie Wallwork visited the iconic statue
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
06 February 2008
The 'Ribble Piddler' statue may not have been properly looked after, according to the man who created it.
Sculptor Thomas Dagnall says he has not been able to work on the wooden piece himself because of health and safety rules.

The £21,000 statue, officially called Gauging the Ribble, was removed from the side of the Millennium Ribble Link canal last week after a routine inspection found considerable decay.

Mr Dagnall, of North Road in Bretherton, says he used healthy wood to create the statue and provided a full maintenance programme.

He said the statue should have lasted for up to 40 years – but it was only put in place five years ago.

He said: "I carved the figure initially from sound, locally-sourced oak and it was preserved with a fungicide/insecticide and then a silicone water repellent prior to installation on the link.

"I have tried to have it preserved over the years and it was in the contract that it was British Waterways' responsibility and it was a bit of an uphill battle really.

"I haven't been able to fix it myself in recent years because I am not allowed on British Waterways land to do any work because of health and safety.

>> Ribble Piddler riddle could be solved soon

"I was asked for and supplied a maintenance schedule which included an annual inspection.But to my knowledge, this hasn't happened."

In response to the question of incorrect maintenance, Iain Weston, British Waterways North West Works Planner, said: "It's just speculation until we know what's wrong.

"But what I will say is that it's not due to a lack of care."

British Waterways expect to know the reason behind the damage next week following an investigation.

>> Complete our Great Transport Debate questionnaire now

>> Vote in our latest web poll

leptv

The full article contains 308 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 February 2008 11:20 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

barnfarm,

water way to run a canal network 06/02/2008 14:14:30
I wonder if last year's Government decision to cut the British Waterways budget by £25million had any bearing on whether or not proper maintenance of this smart statue would be funded...
2

Tramfan,

penwortham 06/02/2008 15:58:07
Because of its suggestive naughty appearance, this 'piddly' statue has been a magnet for vandals and graffitti artists ever since the day it was erected. It's removal is perhaps a blessing. A pity the persons who commissioned the statue in the first place didn't foresee the obvious consequences. Most everybody else did .......
3

daz2k,

ingol preston 06/02/2008 18:44:57
I'm writing this because of all the goings on about the ribble piddler developing cracks could it be something to do with when the council removed graffiti from the sculpture with paint stripping chemicals which are very harsh and will remove all preservatives from wood and then they steam clean it off which actually forces the stripping chemicals into the wood and if not treated immediately afterwards it will leave the oak totally open to the elements of nature i do work with chemicals and this seems pretty obvious but who would take the blame for this
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.