Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Preston to finally get proper ring road?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
29 November 2008
A motorway link connecting north and south Preston is back on the agenda, the Evening Post can reveal.
The public are being asked for their views on an "outer ringroad" joining the M55 with the M6 by snaking round the west side of Preston through South Ribble.

The road, around eight miles long, would stretch from Lostock Hall to a new junction two of the M55 at Catforth. A bridge would need to be built across the River Ribble and greenbelt land would need to be carved up to make way for the link.

Plans for the so-called "Preston Box" – or the Preston southern and western bypass – were shelved in the early 1990s when the M6 was widened to four lanes.

The resurrected plans – still at an early stage – have received a mixed reaction from Lancashire's communities, with some vowing to repeat the staunch opposition mounted 16 years ago.

Coun Margaret Smith, leader of South Ribble Council and representitive for New Longton and Hutton East, said: "Opposition was huge and the residents themselves formed a committee which was a very effective committee. There would be an equal amount of opposition to it as there was last time."

And Coun Jon Hesketh, who represents Longton and Hutton West at South Ribble Council, said: "There are certain people that would like to have it but it's only normal the people who live in the area would have the same objections as last time.

"There would be quite a lot of opposition."

But Coun Ken Hudson, leader of Preston Council, said: "It would benefit Preston tremendously because it would ensure there was a good flow of traffic to Southport and Liverpool. This motorway box was always seen as being very strategic as far as Preston traffic was concerned.

"It's still in its embryonic stage.

"There's no specific funding in place and it's not in the transport plan but I think this is a method of getting it in the transport plan."

It comes in the week transport secretary Geoff Hoon confirmed plans to invest an extra £1bn in major transport projects next year to stimulate the economy. A list of projects due to benefit does not include any in Lancashire.

But an announcement is due in the New Year about opening the hard-shoulder to traffic on around 500 lane miles of Britain's motorways.
The Preston ringroad is part of the Central Lancashire Preferred Core Strategy which outlines the planning issues facing Preston, South Ribble and Chorley until 2026.

County Coun Matthew Tomlinson, cabinet member for sustainable development at Lancashire County Council, said the county council's top road priority was the Ormskirk bypass.

He added: "What we're concerned about is enabling people to move around Central Lancashire by whatever means they can."

>> Bypass blues

>> By-pass could open in two years


>> Vote in our latest web poll

Lancashire Evening Post

The full article contains 482 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 December 2008 7:55 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Pear,

01/12/2008 09:45:27
Too big ! I see this becoming like the M60 or M25 were it is always clogged up. We all know what happens when the motorway gets clogged, all the inner roads do as well.

As I said last week, just connect the A582 roundabout (Booths) to the A583 (down near Makro) and have a flyover junction with the A59.
2

jonh,

01/12/2008 12:35:09
Pear has a point, the main need here is a bypass to the west of Preston to enable large volumes of traffic to avoid Preston city centre.
3

P500,

01/12/2008 13:19:04
They want a complete ring road so they can introduce an inner congestion charge in a few years time. Or maybe that's too cynical?
4

Robin Peterson,

South Ribble 01/12/2008 15:32:56
The objectors will only have the moral high ground if they can claim that they never drive on motorways past other people's houses. That means the 2 per cent without access to a car. As for the other 98 per cent........
5

Ribbleton,

Preston 01/12/2008 15:39:16
Comment 4 - 30% of UK households do not have access to a car not just 2% . Although I am carless, I dont hold the moral high ground, I just think it would be poor use of taxpayers money and of the DfT's budget that could be spent elsewhere on more beneficial transport projects. It seems DfT agree as its not on their list of priorities to get a share of the extra £1bn.
6

Pear,

01/12/2008 16:09:32
FAO: Robin Peterson
I'm a car driver and I like motorways, but I see this as pointless. Let me make the situation clear regarding the M60 which I often drive on.

Once a car breaks down or their is a crash then the motorway grinds to a halt, all the motorways connecting in like M61 or M62 also grind to a halt.

If there was an accident on the M55 this would affect the M6 and also the new link road. It would also cause unbelievable congestion around Preston.

The roads coming from the South and West of Preston (A583, A59, A582, A6) are all very good and usually dual carriageways. Its only once they get into Preston/Penwortham there is a problem.

If you look at a map of South Ribble its not obvious where the M65 would actually run towards the river (without using existing roads)
7

The Big G,

01/12/2008 18:28:15
I really don't see the need for it - yes there is congestion in Preston, but not as bad as many other places around the UK to which I have to travel.

All this will do is lead to congestion and further development within our green belt area. Some of the places through which they will have to build will destroy local areas that many use to get away from the hustle and bustle and I don't mean the residents, I mean the walkers, the cyclists, the general public who appreciate the green belt area.

If they had planned better we could have had a dual carriageway where EastWay and Tome Benson Way are and then have extended that through better planning to The Penwotham flyover and then had dual carriageway through Lostock Hall and Leyland, but as I said that would have needed planning, when they built those roads many years ago many of us, then said they should have been dual carriageway. All that could have been done without the need to now suggest taking more green belt area.

But as per normal Preston's road network planners reacts to a situation and does not plan for the future.
8

Preston Guild-City 2012,

01/12/2008 18:36:04
A good idea ...if you want to see all that greenbelt land suddenly freed up for development on the other side of the river. I doubt it'll happen for a very very long time anyway.
9

Molly's Dad,

Fulwood 01/12/2008 23:16:03
Oh yea! Is this another pie-in-the-sky plan dreamed up by Preston Borough Council, oops, sorry, City Council, as published this week in their propaganda blurb which costs 17p per issue (where 6 park-and-rides are promised for year 2026?). They can deduct 17p per issue from my Council Tax Direct Debits. Also, anyone who has ever wondered why the M55 hasn't got a Junction No2. Cllr Geoff Driver knows my feelingsa about Council-produced propaganda sheets wasting Council Tax payers money.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.