Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Paedophile out in 'less than a year'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
10 October 2008
A judge has slammed a legal loophole which allowed a paedophile to escape a lengthy prison sentence.
Related stories
>> Paedophile used libraries to distribute child porn

Judge Norman Wright spoke out after sentencing pervert Andrew Galeney to 32 months behind bars - when he wanted to sentence him to six years.

Judge Wright said the loophole - which gives offenders a third off their sentence if they plead guilty - allows convicts to avoid additional powers such as indefinite jail sentences.

The threshold for indeterminate sentences comes into force at six years.

He said it meant the whole purpose of the additional powers, to protect the public, was ineffective in cases were offenders plead guilty at the first opportunity.

Judge Wright told Preston Crown Court: "I cannot make a sentence of imprisonment for public protection unless I think the appropriate sentence is six years, because you pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity.

"Because parliament has changed the law I cannot take the route that I feel needs to be taken to protect the public in your case.

"A defendant who properly deserves a sentence of this kind can avoid it by pleading guilty at the earliest opportunity."

Galeney has already served 259 days in custody - and could be out in less than a year.

Galeney, 45, from Beacon Lodge, Ribbleton, pleaded guilty to 24 counts relating to distributing, making and possession of images of children.

The Evening Post told earlier this week how Galeney was able to live close to children, 100 yards from a playground and close to Preston Grange Primary School despite being on the Sex Offenders Register.

SEE The Evening Post on Saturday for more on this story.

>> Vote in our latest web poll

>> Have your say on our special traffic and travel rantline

Traffic & travel



The full article contains 301 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 October 2008 8:06 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

talktalk,

here 10/10/2008 21:29:31
a shoplifter gets more than that....obviously the law protects him again i fear for residents where his parents live
2

,

10/10/2008 23:53:30
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
3

Fighting for a chav free Preston,

11/10/2008 09:15:05
Well heres another that i hope dies behind bars! Much like the other one fron last week.
4

,

11/10/2008 09:54:04
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
5

,

11/10/2008 10:03:15
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
6

,

11/10/2008 14:12:25
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
7

Stel,

Preston 11/10/2008 20:24:37
I went to court to see justice be served and I was disappointed, except in this instance the judges hands were tied. I don't know who was more gutted me or the judge !
I fear for the people he will live around when he is released as unlike us they will not have a clue what he is and they will probably chat to him while their kids play, just like I used to, little will they know he is fantasising about torturing and mudering their children.
8

vader,

deep space 11/10/2008 23:27:05
why bother keeping people like this - bring back the death penalty
9

tonyjames,

13/10/2008 10:19:06
Keep him jailed and burn his house down!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.