Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Nuclear lab to create hundreds of jobs



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
24 July 2008
A national nuclear laboratory is to be based near Preston as part of a £2bn energy masterplan, creating hundreds of new jobs in Lancashire.
The Government's ambitious West Cumbria energy plans, which will transform the coastline into an "energy coast" and provide a new nuclear reactor at Sellafield, will create 16,000 jobs in total.

And Preston is set to benefit from a huge slice of the landmark investment in future energy - with a new research laboratory to be built at the Springfields site in Salwick near the city.

Government Business Secretary John Hutton revealed the proposals on Wednesday.

Mr Hutton said: "The government will be doing all it possibly can to ensure the country as a whole, and local people, enjoy the economic dividends of the switch to nuclear, which is going to happen."

The move is being seen as a vital part of the regeneration of the UK's nuclear industry.

Springfields was the first plant in the world to make nuclear fuel and to date has produced several million fuel elements and provided products and services for over 140 reactors in more than 12 countries.

In November 1999, following the acquisition of Westinghouse by BNFL and their American partners, Morrison Knudsen, Springfields became the UK Fuel Business of the Westinghouse Nuclear Fuel Business Unit.

In Cumbria, the regeneration will also include more money for schools and academies and an acute hospital in West Cumbria.

It is also expected that more cash will be spent on improving transport links and attracting tourists, including a new hotel in Whitehaven.

>> Vote in our latest web poll

Text alerts

The full article contains 272 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 July 2008 11:52 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Pommy Sheila,

24/07/2008 07:49:00
ok
2

barnfarm,

24/07/2008 11:54:09
Whatever you do, don't-mention-the-waste. I mentioned it once back there, but I think I got away with it...
3

Sam Tana,

24/07/2008 13:51:35
At least with nuclear waste you can see it, monitor it, manage it, treat it and keep it secure - unlike with conventional power stations where it goes up the chimney, invisibly.

I guess the lab might be looking into ways to further reduce waste. Whatever the case, without nuclear as part of the power production portfolio of the future, we're heading for a new dark age.
4

barnfarm,

24/07/2008 14:16:16
Yes, with nuclear waste we can see it, monitor it, manage it, treat it and keep it secure.
At massive expense. To be met by the taxpayer, rather than the nuclear industry. For hundreds and hundreds of years.
According to the BBC in June: "The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, the body in charge of dealing with the UK's radioactive waste, admitted recently that the costs of cleaning up EXISTING nuclear waste, estimated to already be £73bn, were likely to spiral by billions."
5

Sam Tana,

24/07/2008 14:38:33
And your alternative to that would be...?
6

barnfarm,

24/07/2008 16:02:19
The UK nuclear programme as proposed is no more financially viable (unless the taxpayer is to pay twice, once to foreign owned generators and once to clean up after them) than is dependence on foreign oil or gas, to which nuclear is supposedly an alternative!
One alternative would be if the state built and ran the reactors, then at least the profitable side of the business could partially subsidise its spiralling costs.
7

Sam Tana,

24/07/2008 16:18:20
Well, I'm all for that idea, barnfarm. But who ever runs the generators, the future is - to an extent - nuclear.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.