Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Lone parents set to be hit in Queen's Speech



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 December 2008
Plans to force lone parents with children as young as one to prepare for work or face benefit cuts are likely to form the centre piece of Wednesday's Queen's Speech.
Ministers are understood to have put welfare reform at the heart of the Government's next legislative programme, with an insistence that almost everyone on benefits should be preparing themselves for work.

But they are on course for a bruising encounter with leftwing Labour MPs and the unions.

Work and Pensions Secretary James Purnell threw his weight behind a review prepared by academic Paul Gregg, which is now likely to be the blueprint for the forthcoming Welfare Reform Bill.

The legislation is likely to require unemployed people to carry out community service-style duties like digging gardens if they do not look for work but still want their benefits.

It is also likely to include a new category of benefit claimants called the 'progression to work' group, which would include lone parents with children aged one or more.

This group would have to make themselves ready for work or face benefit "sanctions".

The measure beefs up previous proposals to make it a requirement for lone parents with children aged seven or more to seek work.

Mr Purnell said: "The approach that virtually everyone should be doing something in return for benefits is the right one."

The most recent Government figures showed there were 1,800 lone parents in Preston, 1,470 in Lancaster, 740 in Chorley and 700 in South Ribble.

But the proposal is likely to be deeply unpopular with union chiefs and some MPs.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: "This approach to welfare assumes a utopian world of unrestricted childcare and widely available jobs where only the lazy opt for life on the dole."

The Queen's Speech is also likely to make it easier for councils to block new lap dancing clubs.

Ministers want to reclassify lap-dancing clubs as "sex encounter establishments."

This would mean they are regarded in the same way as peep shows that "provide visual sexual stimulation" and would make it easier for town halls to throw applications out.

Ground-breaking legislation to fulfil Labour's pledge to end child poverty is also likely to feature in the speech.

And it is also likely to include a policing and crime reduction Bill which would introduce directly-elected police representatives - despite a warning that the move could land Lancashire taxpayers with a £2m bill.

The LEP reported warnings earlier this month from Lancashire Police Authority that the election of 14 Crime and Policing Representatives (CPRs) in the county could lead to British National Party (BNP) politicians getting a say over policing.

Chorley MP Lindsay Hoyle today added his voice to the growing opposition to the plans, saying: "I do not think it is the way forward. We elect local councillors and this is just another cost burden."

The Government's programme is also expected to include a citizenship, immigration and borders Bill requiring new immigrants to learn English and restricting full access to benefits and social housing to full British citizens.


The full article contains 523 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 December 2008 6:02 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

NewGirl,

Preston 02/12/2008 18:20:37
I recall when I was a single parent through no fault of my own, living in a rural area where there were no child minders, no support from my family and after school schemes were non-existent. How on earth could anyone in that position be expected to get a job, voluntary or otherwise? To force single parents into this, it will create a class of neglected children; the Govt will be held to account if it happens but I fear it'll be too late once those children have grown into adult delinquents.
2

MynameisPaul,

02/12/2008 20:42:17
I thought the majority of delinquent kids WERE from single parent families, no discipline, no patriarchal input or guidance, Steady streams of potential Dads to get used to e.t.c.
I find it ironic that the left; who are instrumental in
dismantling the nuclear family, are complaining about it in the article... Mind you, they probably aren't interested in the plight of the 'family unit' as much as the threat to benefits.
3

Hoggie,

02/12/2008 21:35:04
I was a single parent until the little darlings reached the age of 18.I suppose i am still a single parent; I never got a blumin penny from the goverment.
I worked full time and in the early hours studied hard to attain a degree.Not every body chooses to be a single parent,every child has a biological father those that do not pay for the child should be made to;
4

Jack Davenport,

Preston 02/12/2008 21:48:24
I was raised by a single parent who had to balance her responsibility to me with a busy professional role. I am pretty certain I didn't turn out a delinquent (despite what some opposition councillors may think ;-) ). Indeed, I don't believe that my upbringing was diminished at all.

There is a big mythos about single parents that I think is distinctly unsettling and a little insulting. It would be better to examine the more general issues of income and social class to see why a minority of children turn to more anti-social ways, which I believe is what post no. 2 was referring to (somewhat erroneously I might add).

More important that the policy regarding single parents though, are the references to the attempts to eradicate child poverty. It is an ambitious and unprecedented target set by a British government. It will be important to see how much effort is put into bringing that policy forward.
5

Sam Tana,

02/12/2008 22:52:26
It's typical of the government to be insisting "that almost everyone on benefits should be preparing themselves for work" just when everyone in work is preparing themselves for life on benefits!

Jobs? What jobs?
6

Fighting for a chav free Preston,

03/12/2008 07:33:19
*working from home is a answer to a few questions on here!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.