Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Lessons learned in £1.4m parks blunder



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
14 October 2008
Town hall chiefs today admitted lessons need to be learned over blunders which blighted the multi-million pound transformations of two Preston parks.
An astonishing catalogue of staffing problems and a complex budget "conspired" to leave the first phase of the redevelopment of Avenham and Miller Parks more than half a million pounds over budget, Preston Council bosses say.

But a report to councillors, to be debated at a council meeting this week, admits more people should have known about how the scheme was supposed to be managed.

For a slideshow of Avenham Park images click here

The report comes less than a month after city bosses admitted a miracle was needed to save the second phase of the scheme, with the council needing to find £1.4m by Christmas.

Problems began in 2006 when senior officers asked for fees to be capped at 12% and any remaining costs to be taken from the council's revenue account.

But that did not happen, resulting in an overspend of £515,000 because fees continued to be charged to the capital account.

And to compound the mistake, when an accountant assigned to the project team, which was monitoring funding, left the council, a new accountant was told there were "no issues arising".

That new accountant then suffered a sporting injury and was off for three months.

The only other officer who knew the capital scheme had reached its limit died before the accountant returned to work. So no-one picked up on the mistake until January this year.

The council's director of finance and business services Bernard Hayes said: "No individual is being blamed in their absence for this problem occurring.

"It is clear that a complex financing package, together with a series of personnel changes, conspired against the council and a relatively simple instruction was not complied with."

Ex-mayor and Riversway Coun Bhikhu Patel today said officers had been "open and honest" about the mistakes.

He said: "The council officers did not manage the project very well and the contractors worked at a great speed at the end instead of programming the work. Overall there is work which needs a lot of remedy, but it is time to move on."

>> Vote in our latest web poll

>> View our slideshow archive

The full article contains 386 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 October 2008 12:48 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

David C,

15/10/2008 10:08:22
That will be a first, Preston Council learn something.
2

barnfarm,

15/10/2008 11:40:41
A farce, over which hangs the subtle fishy aroma of strategic ignorance and corporate deceit. Good luck with Winckley Square, you shower.
3

River,

15/10/2008 17:47:02
All Preston City Council's best brains, thinking and resources have been devoted to helping the developers build Tithebarn.

Other aspects of the council's work were left short handed and ignored.

The residents of Preston suffer as a consequence.
4

Symseek,

Preston 15/10/2008 18:28:02
Same old story; no one to blame; no one held responsible;no one fired...how cosy.Can we have a rate rise to cover our stupidity please?...certainly...
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.