Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 9th February 2010

Keep quiet order over 'quackery' courses

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 September 2008
A university chief has told staff to keep quiet after ordering a review into courses slammed as "quackery" by an outspoken lecturer.
Dr Malcolm McVicar, vice chancellor at the University of Central Lancashire, told staff in an internal newsletter to "refrain from comment or speculation" while the controversial courses are being scrutinised.

It comes after Dr Mike Eslea, a senior lecturer in psychology, blasted the university for adding complementary therapy courses in herbal medicine and acupuncture to its degree portfolio.

He described them as "quackery" and accused UCLan of running courses that would "severely damage" its reputation and have "no academic justification".

His comments have now led university bosses to review the legitimacy of the courses.

Dr McVicar, in the e-mailed newsletter, said: "Whilst the review is taking place, we need to recognise that there are students and staff studying and teaching on these courses which have satisfied the university's quality assurance procedures and been duly validated.

"I would therefore ask that colleagues would refrain from comment or speculation which would cause concern to these students and staff."

In his open letter to Dr McVicar, Mr Eslea wrote: "Although acupuncture and herbalism have been practised in one form or another for thousands of years, most of what we now call 'traditional' Chinese medicine is quite a recent invention."

He added: "It was concocted in the 1950s from a hotchpotch of folk myths and superstitions.

"Our hopes of being taken seriously as a research institution are being severely damaged by our association with such quackery, but now we are adding yet more bogus therapy to our portfolio."

A spokesman for UCLan said: "As a university we value and practise transparency and tolerance and welcome all academic viewpoints.

"With this in mind, and because we have received concerns from some colleagues as to whether the university should offer courses in homeopathy, herbalism and acupuncture, the university has set up a working group to review all the issues."

The working group, led by Eileen Martin, Pro Vice-Chancellor and Dean to the Faculty of Health, will report its findings and recommendations to the vice-chancellor later in the academic year.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 September 2008 4:03 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Robin Peterson,

South Ribble 10/09/2008 14:35:36
I cannot understand why Trading Standards have not become involved in investigating herbalism and homeopathy. As for teaching them as academic subjects? What about recreating the old Wild West Medicine Shows selling snake oil? The scientific evidence for that is just as sound. One final thought - can you get hold of a herbalist on Boxing day?
2

David C,

10/09/2008 14:36:50
what a dictator. Be quiet get on with your work or your fired. How about tell the would, sign up to the LEP and tell us how it is.
3

Beverley Kirwan,

Preston 10/09/2008 14:52:25
There is no protection for whistle blowers. Good on Mike Eslea for his courage and good luck to him. Are these daft courses worth the fees, time and debt incurred to the students? Don't think so.
4

Rachael R,

Denver 11/09/2008 00:25:29
I wonder what kind of exposure, if any has Elslea and the individuals with the previous comments have had with acupuncture? Acupuncture is accepted by the world health organization, as well as many major insurance companies as providing effective treatment. There are countless studies proving it's benefit. The comment that it is a "recent invention" is preposterous, There are printed acupuncture academic records, dating back 500 years.
5

River,

11/09/2008 17:05:58
One of the most basic essentials for academic excellence is that academics are free to speak and think as they find.

This means advocates of Chinese medicine should be free to speak up about the benefits of their practice, and critics, like Mike Eslea, should be free to question the validity of these claims.

If we have a situation where one or both are silenced, then where can critical thinking, academic debate and genuine testing of knowledge happen?

It seems our universities are no longer places where people can speak or think freely, but corporate institutions where 'brand reputation' matters more than genuine academic quality.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.