Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Jury slams police over high speed death



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 October 2008
A jury has accused Lancashire police of "institutionalised complacency" as it convicted an officer over a collision which led to the death of a pensioner in a high speed training exercise.
Peter Williams, 67, was killed when PC Sean Schofield's marked Volvo T5 hit his car head-on at 94mph.

The advanced police driver hit speeds of 104mph moments before he ploughed into Mr Williams' VW Touran in Lancashire in November 2006.

Schofield was found guilty at Liverpool Crown Court of careless driving.

The seven men and five women of the jury sent a note to the judge criticising Lancashire Police Force for allowing the high speed training exercise on the narrow country lane, which had a speed limit of 60mph.

Schofield, who was acquitted of causing death by dangerous driving, was testing in-car Vascar (Vehicle Average Speed Computer and Recorder) equipment that involved him chasing a car driven by trainer PC Andrew Massingham, 41, to register its speed.

PC Massingham was acquitted of causing death by dangerous driving and did not face the alternative charge of careless driving.

Lancashire Constabulary's Assistant Chief Constable Chris Weigh said: "This has been an incredibly long and difficult investigation for everyone involved and my thoughts are with Mr Williams' family and friends at this incredibly difficult time.

"On behalf of Lancashire Constabulary, I would like to offer them my deepest sympathies."

He went on to say PCs Massingham and Schofield would remain on "alternative duties" while the force "digested" what the court and the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) had said.

* For more reaction to this story see Wednesday's Lancashire Evening Post

The full article contains 277 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 October 2008 7:41 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

Fighting for a chav free Preston,

07/10/2008 16:06:38
Wow.....I wasnt expecting that
2

,

07/10/2008 16:21:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Abusive
3

,

07/10/2008 16:31:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Abusive
4

,

07/10/2008 17:16:58
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
5

,

07/10/2008 17:19:20
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
6

pnemickey,

Preston 07/10/2008 17:52:32
the policemen driving should never have been allowed to partake in such a dangerous exercise, in my opinion the officers in charge of the exercise should be prosecuted.
7

,

07/10/2008 18:06:32
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
8

,

07/10/2008 18:20:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Abusive
9

,

07/10/2008 18:27:05
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
10

,

07/10/2008 18:30:44
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.