Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 29th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Is this Preston's most stupid burglar?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
12 June 2008
A bungling burglar from Lancashire went back to the scene of his latest crime - to ask for his mobile phone which he had left behind.
Stuart Gardner from Preston kept leaving his property at crime scenes.

On the most recent occasion he returned to one home he had burgled to tell 74-year-old Peter Diamond: "I'm the person who broke in - can I have my mobile phone back?"

His victim said: "The chap appeared in the garden wanting his phone. I couldn't believe his cheek. He had some front to come back."

Now the 30-year-old, of Scotforth Road, Fishwick, has been jailed for more than three years by a judge at Preston Crown Court.

One police source described his actions as "a very stupid thing to do".

Pensioner Mr Diamond, also from Fishwick, told the Lancashire Evening Post of his "complete shock" when Gardner brazenly walked into his garden to ask for his phone back.

Gardner also gave back to retired magician Mr Diamond the house keys he had stolen.

The court was also told how, in a bizarre twist, when police arrived to take Mr Diamond's statement, the officer received a report another property in the street had been targeted.

The officer raced to that property and caught Gardner red-handed with a rucksack full of stolen property.

He told her: "You've got me - I'm the burglar."

Mr Diamond had followed the officer and Gardner turned to him and apologised for breaking into his property.

The court heard Gardner had smashed the back window to force his way inside before ransacking the ground floor of Mr Diamond's terraced property, pulling papers out of cupboards and emptying drawers as he searched for cash.

But he fled after going upstairs and hearing the householder making noises in his room.

Fingerprints

Mr Diamond, who travelled the world performing illusions for more than 30 years, said: "The burglary really shook me up. It was so frightening.

"But I'm not going to let this get to me. I'm glad he's gone to jail. He deserves it."

At the time of the Fishwick burglaries in February, Gardner was on bail after being arrested for a break-in at commercial premises and the theft of copper cable.

He had been caught after leaving a tobacco pouch with his fingerprints at the scene of another of the crimes.

In court Gardner admitted three burglaries and theft, and asked for a further 12 burglaries to be taken into consideration.

He had 44 previous offences on his record and was liable for a statutory minimum three-year sentence, the court heard.

Defence counsel Adrian Williams said a promising career as a plasterer was blighted by an amphetamine habit which was costing him, at one time, £100 a day.

Judge Anthony Russell QC, the Recorder of Preston, jailed Gardner for three years and three months.

He said it was sad to see a man with so much promise and a good work background to be committing offences because of drug abuse.

Speaking after the hearing, Det Sgt Matt Kerr of Preston CID said: "By his own actions Gardner convicted himself."

>> Vote in our latest web poll

i-map

The full article contains 535 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 June 2008 2:06 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
2
1

At work,

STAND rd 12/06/2008 09:35:06
hahaha idiot
2

,

12/06/2008 10:01:51
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: The user has spammed the commenting facility with inappropriate comments. Posting rights revoked.
3

,

12/06/2008 10:03:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: The user has spammed the commenting facility with inappropriate comments. Posting rights revoked.
4

tonyjames,

kirkham 12/06/2008 10:53:56
Now he has his own cell with clean clothes and sheets, tv, gym facilities a daily routine with some regular work and hot meals, fully paid for the next three years....Who's laughing now!?!
5

brigpnefan,

preston 12/06/2008 10:55:30
What a cheeky dim wit!I noticed that this idiot picked on an old person,that is how low these low life robbers stoop to. No doubt he will be out in no time and back at his crimes. What is this country coming to?
6

,

12/06/2008 11:32:30
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
7

jamie-r,

preston 12/06/2008 11:46:56
must of been a good mobile
8

Dave Thorp,

Preston 12/06/2008 12:15:05
You'd think he'd have just broken back in and robbed the phone. Daft sod!
9

dom ed,

P2 12/06/2008 12:54:15
the stupid little smak hed, i cant believe it, bet the phone was stolen to. hes no gud to any one he would be better off dead.
10

Pav,

Manchester 12/06/2008 13:04:57
Whilst I have every feeling of sadness for the victims of these crimes, I can't help but ask people to consider why the offender has not received help and why he is paroled whilst he is clearly of a mindset to return to his previous life and habitually reoffend.
There is a dangerous precedent here that burglary will be tolerated and the punishment is not punitive.
The offender had 44 previous offences. He asked for 12 offences to be taken into account, whilst being tried for four.
It's time the Prison Service, Police and Government held their hands up and said they have failed the community and failed this offender.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.