Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Hunt for city think tank supremo



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 August 2008
A high profile figure is to be recruited to lead an overhauled Preston think-tank.
Council bosses want to employ a chief executive to head the much-criticised Preston Vision Board and bring millions of pounds of regeneration cash into the city.

Councillors are being asked to agree to make the board a limited company – known as Preston Vision Ltd – to give it more clout and make it more accountable.

The public-private sector body has helped to attract £14m of North West Development Agency (NWDA) cash to Preston since 2005, with several million more in the pipeline.

Jim Carr, chief executive of Preston Council, said he hoped the new organisation would attract £18m-£20m in the first three to four years of its life.

He said: "The idea is to have a high-profile chief executive who can relate well to the private sector and negotiate with potential developers with the aim of attracting entrepreneurs into the city.

"We will be able to use the NWDA money but we need private sector investment too, so we need an individual who will relate well to that agenda.

"As yet, we haven't agreed a job description or remuneration package but I'm pretty sure the board will want to attract the best individual they can and the best they can afford."

Council leader Ken Hudson fears that without the extra powers, the vision board will be out-done by similar organisations in Blackpool and East Lancashire in the competition for NWDA money.

He said: "It's absolutely vital that Preston seizes the opportunity that is now presenting itself."

Leading figures at John Lewis, Grosvenor and Lendlease – all central to the £700m Tithebarn project – will be invited to join the new organisation, along with representatives from Preston Council, Lancashire County Council and the university.

South Ribble Council would also be asked to put someone forward as a company member.

The full article contains 321 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 August 2008 10:01 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

David C,

29/08/2008 12:36:09
Hey heres an idea, tell Grovesnor to sod off and let the serious men do the work. Preston could be big, very big, but not if you leave money grabbing small fry Grovesnor involved. I am serious look at terrorism charges, what a con. Preston will own nothing and there for make nothing in the future.
2

Goodsocialist,

Utopia 29/08/2008 15:32:36
The council will have to give up some assets for the Tithebarn scheme but gets a profit share instead. I don't really understand how Grosvenor are small fry...they've rebuilt Liverpool city centre surely they're good enough for us?

Not that I'm in favour of profiteering of course but there is not a queue of poeple waiting to invest in Preston. What other choice is there?
3

River,

29/08/2008 17:36:09
Can I nominate Aiden Turner Bishop to do this job?

With his understanding of Preston architecture, and his sensitivity to the environment, he could help the Vision Board create a vision for Preston that matches much more closely to our needs, and to the aspirations of real Preston people, than whatever a corporate suit from Downtown Preston in Business could ever deliver.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.