Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 2nd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Government hits back at sex case claim



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 October 2008
The Government has hit back after a judge slammed a legal loophole which allowed a convicted paedophile to be spared a six-year jail term.
Judge Norman Wright spoke out after he was only allowed to sentence pervert Andrew Galeney to 32 months behind bars because he pleaded guilty.

Judge Wright said he wanted to jail him for six years but, because Galeney pleaded guilty, he automatically had a third of his sentence cut.

Galeney has already served 259 days in custody – and could be out in less than a year.

Galeney, 45, from Beacon Lodge, Ribbleton, pleaded guilty to 24 counts relating to distributing, making and possession of images of children.

In a statement, the Ministry of Justice said: "We do not comment on individual cases.

"Protecting the public from sexual offenders is fundamental, that's why prison sentences and sex offender prevention orders, which if breached mean offenders go back to jail, are available to sentencers.

"Passing sentence is a matter for the judiciary, but it is long established practice for sentencers to take into account the fact that defendants who plead guilty at an early stage save the expense of a full trial and more importantly save the victim from the additional distress of giving evidence in court."

>> Vote in our latest web poll

leptv

The full article contains 223 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 October 2008 10:18 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

very concerned,

13/10/2008 14:29:10
so how is this hitting back??????????
it doesnt say the judge could have given him 6 years if he wanted to?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.