Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fears over Tithebarn regeneration scheme



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
11 March 2008
Preston's ambitious regeneration plans are in danger of falling flat because the multi-million pound Tithebarn project is stifling private innovation.
A stark assessment, maybe, but an increasingly prevalent view among Preston's top business brains.

Not, of course, that they doubt the Tithebarn Regeneration, scheduled to be completed by 2014, will be anything but massively beneficial to the city.

But there is a growing concern that not allowing the private sector to play its part in Preston's future could see it miss a "golden opportunity".

Chris Scott, a solicitor at DWF, one of the city's biggest firms, draws a striking analogy with the recent regeneration of Tyneside.

For the scores of miners, shipworkers and builders driven out of Newcastle amid a decline in traditional industry, Tyneside is barely recognisable today.

With millions of pounds of public and private sector cash pumped into the city and neighbouring Gateshead, the area is thriving.

But in nearby Sunderland, according to Mr Scott, the picture is quite different.

Whereas Newcastle and Gateshead's combination of public cash and private innovation has seen the city undergo a remarkable rebirth, the millions pumped into Sunderland have failed to prompt a similar boom.

Why? Because, he says, private sector designers, builders and innovators have not had anything like the same look in.

The warning came at a meeting of some of Preston's key movers and shakers at a Lancashire Property Forum hosted by lobby group Preston Downtown in Business.

Speakers said, regardless of its benefits, Tithebarn could yet stand in the way of Preston becoming a "tremendous city" – because council bosses are rejecting private sector ideas.

This includes the millionaire Patel brothers' attempts to build on Shepherd Street and regenerate a run-down area – rejected by Preston planners because of Tithebarn.

The Patels' plans for a £100m Guild Legacy Building on the old Tradex site also look likely to clash with plans for a multi-storey car park for John Lewis.

Mr Scott said not letting other developments get a look in is driving private sector talent away from the city.

"The finger has perhaps been pointed at the developers (for not doing more) but I'm not sure this is true. The planning process is outside their control and there are concerns it is being manipulated until Tithebarn is a reality," he says.

"What the private sector does best is innovate, but are they being allowed to do that in Preston or is innovation being stifled? I know at least one developer that is looking at pulling out already.

"There must be a partnership between the public and private sector and, at the moment, public sector plans are standing in the way of that.

"Tithebarn would be a great thing, but it is only one element of a design that could be a tremendous city. When I was last here I spoke about the difference between Newcastle-Gateshead and Sunderland.

"Newcastle-Gateshead is like Preston and South Ribble. They were rivals but they put aside their differences for mutual benefit.

"Millions has been pumped into Sunderland but it is not the same."

Alban Cassidy, of Cassidy and Ashton, the architects behind some of the Patel family's schemes is equally concerned about the city's future.

Mr Cassidy said: "If the Patels' visions of a legacy for the Guild is to be quashed because of Tithebarn, what exactly will the 2012 legacy be?

"The council has spoken of its desire to make international standard architecture part of Preston's regeneration, without much idea as to what that might be.

"This (The Guild Legacy Building) is the sort of scheme that, unfortunately, Tithebarn is holding back because that site is proposed for a multi-storey car park," he explained.

"This has an element of the wow factor. Something on a grand scale."

Frank McKenna, chairman of PDIB, adds: "There has been a debate around the city about how welcome the Tithebarn development is.

"Some think it has not been a help but a hindrance in terms of other people not being able to develop."

But Preston Council's regeneration boss Coun Anthony Gornall said: "The private sector must get involved with regeneration but that particular sector of the city has been earmarked for Tithebarn and we can't afford to throw hurdles in the way of the regeneration.

"There are a lot of schemes the private sector can get involved with and a lot of areas that need regenerating."

i-map

The full article contains 740 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 March 2008 10:00 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

River,

11/03/2008 15:29:49
The issue is not public Vs private, Grosvenor and Lend Lease are PRIVATE companies.

The issue is the way that the council seems to be giving preferential treatment to ONE private company at the expense of all the others, and thus putting all its' development eggs in one basket.

Either it should be a PUBLIC scheme, in which case the public should be kept informed and involved at every stage rather than witness the 'cloak and dagger' we have seen so far with this scheme, or it should be a PRIVATE scheme, in which case there should be fair market competition between all the developers.

In this case it seems we have the worst of all worlds, or from a particular developer's point of view, the best of all worlds.
2

barnfarm,

11/03/2008 15:56:07
Too late, too late. Deals have been done, documents signed. Grosvenor and Lend Lease effectively own Preston city centre for the next 250 years, and have far more say over what goes on here than any piddling elected body... Democracy in traction friends.
3

WorkerBee,

Preston 11/03/2008 16:22:26
These concerns are spot on. At times Preston City Council has seemed so scared of upsetting Grosvenor that it has buried its head in the sand over what is going on right under its nose with the rest of the city's (potential) investors. Many of whom are Preston people who have supported the city for years.
4

Ken Nicholls,

Sanbornton 11/03/2008 18:52:08
Mark my words, It will never happen! To much politics and self ego's.
If this had been in the States, it would have been finished by now.
To make this area attractive a 10,000 seat indoor sports arena should be built, with upscale hotels with underground parking and elevated and underground access roads. Would attract Basketball, Ice hockey, indoor sporting events and all kind of concerts, Now that is progress. But it will never happen!
Small minds, Small people, no ambition.
Manchester, New Hampshire, USA was a small city the size of Preston, with a dying city center. the decisiion to build an indoor sports arena was made a few years ago in the city center, The arena is full nearly every night with sporting events and concerts, what a boom it has been for the downtown. New hotels, new businesses, people wanting to live in the city center. Wake up Preston!
5

barnfarm,

11/03/2008 21:02:42
No disrespect Ken, but basketball is the worst sport of all time and would see people flee Preston in droves! Fair points otherwise tho sir. Will people go into town to shop in 30 years time, or buy everything online or in some way we can't even imagine yet? Perhaps a major leisure development IS the way to go.
6

marmalade man,

11/03/2008 22:36:42
Where have the local private investors been all these years?. They only seem interested now that Grosvenor have laid out their plans. If they genuinely want to do something for the people of Preston then why not fund some projects away from the town centre that would benefit all Prestonians. Unless its only protecting their investments and profits that they are interested in.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.