Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 13th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Family 'cheated' over death crash fine



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 May 2008
The devastated family of an 18-year-old student killed in a horror crash feel "cheated" after the driver escaped with just a £1,000 fine.
Matthew Hesketh suffered fatal injuries when his best friend Adam Catterall, 19, overtook two cars on a bend before smashing into an oncoming taxi.

Catterall was cleared by a jury of causing death by dangerous driving, but was found guilty on his own admission of careless driving. As well as the fine, he was also banned from driving for 18 months.

Matthew's grieving parents slammed the sentence and said they will never get over their son's death.

Dad Andrew, 46, who handed a catalogue of Matthew's horrific injuries to Catterall's family as they left Preston Crown Court yesterday, said: "It is sending out the wrong message to young drivers who will think it doesn't matter if they drive dangerously – even if they do end someone's life they will just get fined. We feel so cheated.

"The sentence hasn't brought closure to us. We just feel Matthew was let down in life and now he's been let down in death. I cry every day for my son and have done since he was killed."

Matthew's mum Hilary, 43, a nurse, said: "We never wanted Adam to go down, but at the very least he could have admitted the dangerous driving charge instead of pleading not guilty. We get on as best we can, but we will never recover."

Sports journalism student Matthew, of Woodplumpton Lane, Broughton, died at the scene of the accident – a "gentle bend" on Preston Road, Longridge, in February last year.

Catterall, 19, of Mill Lane, Goosnargh, always denied causing death by dangerous driving. He admitted to the jury at his five-day trial that he had been driving "a bit too fast" in the 50mph zone and should not have overtaken the two cars, but insisted his driving was not dangerous.
Matthew was a back seat passenger, wearing a seatbelt, in the Peugeot 106.

After overtaking two cars Catterall's vehicle lost control and hit an oncoming taxi side on. Matthew died at the scene and another friend of the defendant, sat in the front seat, was injured, as was the taxi driver.

>> Vote in our latest web poll

i-map

The full article contains 383 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 May 2008 9:10 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
  • Related Topics: Travel
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Long live speed limits,

Fylde 10/05/2008 09:54:59
More proof that motorists DO have a license to kill and so-called 'justice' in this country lets drivers gert away with killing innocent people.
What about his admissions of breaking the speed limit? The law in this country regarding killer motorists stinks.
2

PW,

10/05/2008 17:00:34

That is not good enough !

I see bad driving every day on the motorway and elswhere. Bad driving causes deaths and serious injuries.

The speed cameras only catch people going slightly over the speed limit in a straight line. Nothing is being done about the drivers who change lanes without indicating, overtake on the left hand side and recklessly overtake on blind bends.

This driver should have pleaded guilty to everthing for the sake of his own peace of mind and to appologise.
3

Jacassta,

10/05/2008 17:05:42
Going a bit fast on a gentle bend. Don't make me laugh. This road is notorious for boy racers who speed and overtake and sadly there are frequent accidents with a 30 MPH speed limit through Grimsargh jumping to 50MPH in this reasonably straight stretch before returning to 30MPH when entering Longridge. As most vehicles on this straigh speed anyway for this lad to overtake two vehicles at a time must of easily been doing 70 - 80 MPH. My friends were the first to this scene last year and rang the ambulance and the very sad cargnage that faced them supports that Adam Catterall was speeding, drove recklessly without a care for anyones safety. He has to live the rest of his life that he and he alone is responsible for the death of his "best friend", perhaps that will be his life sentence, after robbing the life of his friend
4

Ex Pat in Newcastle,

wallsend 10/05/2008 21:25:36
Pathetic!!
5

John Deakin,

Fulwood 10/05/2008 22:11:56
It's about time that reckless, dangerous, speeding car drivers are held fully accountable for their actions. The punishment should fit the crime. In this case and in many others is clearly does not. The short 18 month driving ban is ridiculously light, a lifetime ban would be appropriate. Drivers like these should never be allowed on the roads ever again.
6

,

11/05/2008 01:05:38
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
7

a forest,

Preston 11/05/2008 01:38:18
Jacassta, I wasn't present in court and haven't seen anything in the press over the course of the trial. Did the prosecution present evidence to support your theory that the driver must have been doing 70 -80?
8

Alberkirky,

Fulwood 12/05/2008 15:42:33
A waste of a bright young man's life and no admission of guilt from the driver.No justice at all for Matty's mum,dad and sister.A very sad day indeed for the British justice system.
9

,

13/05/2008 09:32:35
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
10

Alberkirky,

13/05/2008 14:35:31
Accident or not,most people would honestly hold up their hands and admit that on this occasion they got it wrong and that they were guilty and prepared to suffer the consequences of their actions.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.