Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Council workers walk out over pay cuts



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
29 February 2008
Hundreds of Preston City Council workers are to see their salaries slashed, prompting some to stage a walk-out.
More than 400 people - a third of the entire workforce - in departments including accounts and IT have seen their salaries axed by up to thousands as part of a national pay review.

Council leader Ken Hudson said the "winners" and "losers" could expect to win or lose to the tune of around £7,000.

The bombshell was dropped on the authority's 1,400 staff on Thursday and saw a snap walk-out among some workers which led to the authority's Contact Centre being shut early.

The review is part of a nationwide exercise to bring 'pay equality' between men and women workers and those in different departments.

Coun Hudson said the situation had been forced upon it by the government and the trade unions.

He said: "Where else could you put £2.5m into the wage structure and still upset people? The government has only given us £157,000 to carry out this evaluation, it is the taxpayers of Preston who are really footing the bill.

"I can understand people being upset, when you anticipate your salary is going up and then you receive a letter saying 'sorry, it is going down', you can understand the disappointment.

"A lot of the people who have to go down are the very good, highly-qualified staff who do not have as much contact with the public, while the winners are people like leisure centre staff."

Council chief executive Jim Carr said that the council had put a protection scheme in place to stop people losing money for the next two years with a 50% protection for the third year.

The "winners" will also have their pay increase backdated to April last year.

Mr Carr added there was the right for any worker to appeal their individual evaluation.

Unison branch secretary Emma Ayre said that any walk-out was "unofficial" and she was not aware of any organised union action.

She said: "This is an equality exercise which has been carried out because councils have not looked after pay, particularly women in low-paid jobs."

The union official added that it was still in talks with the council to bring in further changes to pay structures within the Town Hall.

Many staff who huddled in small groups outside the Town Hall after work to discuss the cuts said they were angry at how they had been treated.

One 29-year-old woman, who asked not to be named, said: "We were fuming.

"The manager gave us brown envelopes with these letters in after lunch.

"Everyone just went quiet and sat there reading them.

"There was no explanation, no nothing."

Her colleague, 28, added morale was low, saying: "The cleaners seem to have done well out of it but not the rest of us."

>> Vote in our latest web poll

i-map

The full article contains 492 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 February 2008 10:06 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
2 3 4
1

NAVIGOR,

29/02/2008 08:34:55
Another sign of rip off Britan, while the prices in the shops and fuel stations go up wages dont! its time we stand up and get rid of this pound pinching government but saying that! I cant see any other party that would lookout for its own people. unless your mega rich your damned in this sorry state of a country wich is too interested in the state of affairs in other countries.
2

SensibleSpice,

29/02/2008 09:07:59
Or maybe its a boyut time women were paid equally to me. Call me a revolutionary bra burner or something.
3

SensibleSpice,

29/02/2008 09:10:50
Sorry I seem to be spouting garbage. What I meant to say was:

Maybe it's about time women were paid equally to men. Call me a revolutionary bra-burner or something.

Girlpower.
4

Martyn Rolly,

Fishwick 29/02/2008 09:33:46
Looks like the Tory led council handled this very badly to me. This has been in the pipeline for years, so to hand the news to staff in brown envelopes is ridiculous. There should have been a series of meetings to explain the situation fully. Staff should have been fully aware of who would be likely to 'win' and 'lose' long before the bombshell.
The Tories will just blame the government but the council's been planning this for years - they've let the staff down very badly.
5

Anonpreston,

Preston 29/02/2008 09:54:37
Some of the frontline people dealing with benefit claculations in person & on the phones are now on as little as £14,800 p/a - the council will not retain good staff they will go and then the service will seriously be affected as these roles are very intensive and require a high degree of technical knowledge. The public will lose out in the long term. because the scale have been capped, the opportunity for progression has also gone.
6

nvr2old,

Preston 29/02/2008 10:35:02
Ken Hudson's comments that "a lot of the people who have to go down are the very good, highly-qualified staff who do not have as much contact with the public, while the winners are people like leisure centre staff." shows he hasn't a clue about Job Evaluation
It's because employers are obsessed by Qualifications and don't value the skills required for dealing with the customers that a review of pay was needed.

Frankly, his comments are an insult to leisure centre staff.
7

JonnySm,

Preston 29/02/2008 10:42:48
In my experience a career in local government is merely settled on by the apathetic anyway.

Maybe this will encourage them to go out and get better jobs that they are passionate about, rather than just 'making do' with a job for the flexi-time, free-parking and 15 days off sick per year that the public sector offers.
8

nvr2old,

Preston 29/02/2008 10:47:08
JonnySm, would you like to share your experience with us then? There's a lot of researched evidence, not anecdotal "I know a man whop ...", that people choose the Publiuc Sector as they want to provide a servioce/make a difference to people's lives (Tory councillors excepted I imagine).

9

nvr2old,

Preston 29/02/2008 10:47:30
JonnySm, would you like to share your experience with us then? There's a lot of researched evidence, not anecdotal "I know a man whop ...", that people choose the Publiuc Sector as they want to provide a servioce/make a difference to people's lives (Tory councillors excepted I imagine).

10

JonnySm,

29/02/2008 10:56:29
Unsure why my previous comment was deleted, I do not see what is unsuitable about the expression of my opinion. I trust it will be reinstated in due course.

I stated that local goverment can often be a career for the apathetic. I do not see this as necessarily a bad thing, not everyone is career driven, and many people are happy to settle for a low-pressure career with well-documented perks.

nvr2old, I worked in the public sector for over a year across various departments, and the sentiments I have expressed above were first put to me by someone who had worked there for 10 years. Her exact words to me were "if you have any sort of apathy, you'll end up in local government". I have to say that, during my time there, I was inclined to agree.

Clearly this is not the case for everyone, and I don't mean to generalise. But I disagree that choosing to work in local government is largely a noble decision, taken to 'make a difference'. (Sounds like interview-speak to me.)
Prev
1
2 3 4

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.