Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

www.lookers.co.uk/citroen-preston
 
 
Friday, 12th March 2010

Congestion charge plan proves unpopular

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
08 August 2008
Lancashire Evening Post readers have given the thumbs down to controversial plans to introduce congestion charging in Manchester.
In a survey commissioned by the LEP, three-quarters of all the respondents said they would not support a system of congestion charging in Manchester.

The Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority (GMPTA) is proposing to charge drivers up to £5 for entering the city at peak times on weekdays.

And transport leaders have come under pressure to formally consult Lancashire's motorists before any decision is made.

But Sir Howard Bernstein, clerk to the GMPTA and Manchester City Council's chief executive, said: "Any survey which asks 'Do you support congestion charging' is bound to generate a negative response.

"A more balanced survey would have highlighted the link between the proposed weekday, peak-time only congestion charge and the £3bn investment into public transport which accompanies it.

"What is absolutely vital is that people are aware that the vast bulk of public transport improvements will be in place ahead of the congestion charge coming into operation."

The overwhelming majority of people who travel into Manchester, 79%, use their car to get into the city centre.

Of those, 72% say it would not be viable to make their journey by public transport.

And just 35% said it would encourage people to travel by bus or train instead of in their car.

County Coun Matthew Tomlinson, cabinet member for sustainable development, admits he is "not surprised" by the results.

He said: "When London introduced the congestion charge, 65% of people were against it.

"But I can understand why Manchester is looking at it as a possible answer.

"I don't have to drive into Manchester very often during peak times but when I do it's awfully busy with a lot of single occupancy cars.

"And the local authorities have to wonder how sustainable that is before it completely grinds to a halt."
Chris Dale, vice-chairman of TravelWatch North West, said: "The councils are getting money to upgrade the public transport system in Manchester to get people out of their cars and on to buses and trains.

"But the councils need to recoup the cost somehow and that's how congestion charging comes in, as a contribution towards the new system that's in place."

But Brian MacDowall, of the Association of British Drivers, said: "This is simply extra tax on top of everything else motorists have to pay for."

Just over half of respondents, or 58%, said congestion charging would encourage them to shop in Preston, which is good news for local businesses, according to Preston Chamber of Trade's Nicholas Watson.

He says: "It will definitely be to the advantage of traders in Preston.

It has the opportunity to benefit from people's decisions not to go to Manchester so frequently.

There is a very good offer here from a retail perspective despite the perception that Preston doesn't have a large selection of brands."

And he believes it is not only the retailers who will benefit.

He said: "It will also make deliveries in Manchester for Lancashire firms much easier if there is less traffic on the roads."

Coun Tomlinson said there were no plans to introduce the system in Lancashire for the forseeable future.

"Any thoughts of congestion charging in Lancashire are a long way off."

To have your say on the proposals for congestion charging in Manchester, contact the Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Authority on 0161 2441000.



>> Vote in our latest web poll

>> Have your say on our special traffic and travel rantline

Traffic & travel

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 August 2008 10:31 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Kells95e,

preston 08/08/2008 11:51:34
Er' i might be missing something here, but i find it highly unlikely that any member of the motoring public, are gonna comment, "What a good idea congesting charging is" or "Yeah bring it on". What next ? "Hey let's double VAT!!"
2

jonh,

08/08/2008 12:31:50
"i might be missing something here"

Yes, you are.

If the vote is representative of LEP readers, then 75% are morons.

The proposals for Manchester are not blanket charges as used in London and will be used to good improvements to the public transport networks in the city.
3

WorkerBee,

Preston 08/08/2008 15:54:04
The key figure for me is "72% say it would not be viable to make their journey by public transport". Although some people can travel at different times to avoid the charge this figure should worry employers who need people to be in work at a certain time.
4

Kells95e,

preston 09/08/2008 07:08:36
jonh, I assume from your reply that your a looney-left socialist living in la-la land and you read the "Guardian" ? You do realise that it will cost people at least £25 a week X 4 =£100, extra on their travel costs per month?????
Hello !!! wake up and smell the coffee !!!!
As you sound like you don't drive and never have, you obviously don't appreciate the amount of "stealth" taxes being imposed on the nations motorists, by our looney-left socialist leaders, ten years now they've been going on about putting public transport right and still we're in the same boat, bit like "edukashun" as well. One of the many many reasons your everyday hardworking, mortgage paying, car-owning, trying to keep his head above water resident is fed-up of our government is their obsessive need to tax the average worker to the hilt, throw money at the problem in the shape of a new idealogical "Quango" (usually advertised in the "Guardian")and waste more cash on pointless ideas!
5

Fast Driver,

11/08/2008 01:53:35
Perhaps, between now and whenever the improvements to public transport in Manchester are finished, the government could consider puting a tiny bit of the fifty billion quid a year it lifts out of motorists pockets to one side instead of wasting it all on quangos and shoring up the North East vote. Then, once the bill for the improvements comes in, the government won't have to hit motorists with yet another tax because the paltry 3 billion required will already be in the bank.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.