Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Smoking ban fuels street violence'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 February 2008
Violence in pubs in Preston city centre is being pushed on to the streets because of the controversial smoking ban, police warned today.
Insp Steve Evans said the sudden increase of smokers lighting up outside pubs and restaurants since the ban on July 1 last year has "provoked" trouble in the city centre.

He warned innocent smokers could fall prey to yobs intent on causing trouble by picking fights in the street.

And today, Lancaster police chief, Chief Supt Tim Jacques, said the ban has meant more people are staying at home to drink, sparking more violence in homes and neighbourhoods in the city.

Insp Evans told the Evening Post: "Our figures for violent crime in the city centre are roughly the same, but the focus is shifting on to the streets rather than in pubs.

"The smoking ban has put more people on the streets which can provoke trouble.

"It stands to reason. If there are 20 people stood outside in the street, someone walking the streets looking for trouble has more people to encounter and a bigger choice."

He added: "We are not saying smokers are responsible for violent behaviour - but those people stood outside having cigarettes would normally have been in pubs and not encountered the troublemaker."

This latest revelation comes two weeks after the Evening Post revealed how Church Street in Preston is the most dangerous street in Lancashire with more recorded violent crime than anywhere else in the county.

There were between 515 violent incidents in the city centre out of the 1,132 reported in Central Division between July and December 2007 compared to 488 from the 1,109 total for Central Division in the same period in 2006.

Ronnie Fitzpatrick, landlord of the Dog and Partridge, Friargate, Preston, said: "I think there is less tension in pubs because there is more room - the smokers are outside so not as many people bump into each other, which was often a source for trouble."

Insp John Ainsworth, of Lea Police, said: "People are staying at home more since the smoking ban. Traditionally people would go to the pub, get a takeaway on the way home and it was more relaxed."

slideshows


The full article contains 370 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 February 2008 8:30 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
2
1

,

02/02/2008 12:24:15
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

mandyv,

02/02/2008 14:34:58
Given the ban ws based on lies and Scare mongering, it is just a spiteful ban anyway.

8th August 2006 the HSE in their document OC 255/15 article ? state
" HSE cannot produce epidemiological evidence to link levels of exposure to second hand smoke to the raised risk of contacting specific diseases".
We need to get this ban amended to include ventilation,
freedom2choose.info -- need your support and donations are very welcome, large or small
Warning: Anti-tobacco activism may be hazardous to epidemiologic science
http://www.epi-perspectives.com/content/4/1/13

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/smokinglicenses/ ends in October 2008
These could do with some support please,

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Bn6zye0nh8w
3

Long live speed limits,

Fylde 02/02/2008 15:07:09
Does this mean that nicotine encourages violence? Perfect reason to ban it then.
4

Christopher Traceys-Parade,

On a pavement outside a pub 02/02/2008 15:57:28
The ban is useless, it's the final nails in the pub industry's coffin. A simple exception could've been made to establishments that installed a ventilated room for smokers.

Smokers are standing dangerously close to the kerbs outside some pubs/clubs.
5

Trevor W,

02/02/2008 16:13:33
What a load of nonsense. "Our figures for violent crime in the city centre are roughly the same."
And inside the pubs it is infinitely more pleasant.
Smokers would benefit more than anyone if they gave up this filthy harmful habit.
6

PAUL123,

02/02/2008 17:25:22
I USED TO SMOKE SO DONT CARE WEATHER PEOPLE SMOKE OR NOT ,IT STINKS THOUGH BEYOND BELIEF AND PEOPLE WHO DON,T SMOKE SMOKE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM THE FILTHY THINGS THEY ARE HORRIBLE.
7

Rob Simpson,

UK 02/02/2008 18:31:04
So smokers are getting beat up more. Given that no one cares that they're also raped more thanks to the ban I doubt many people will care about this. People's safety is less important than how clothes smell after a night out, right?
8

Bill Crombie,

02/02/2008 19:26:30
It nice to see the police, although not required to police the smoking ban in law, recognise the problems or consequences of an ill-thought-out ban.

Smokers has being discriminated against for partaking in a legal activity. Get them back in the warm. We need a return to designated smoking pubs, clubs or rooms.

For all the anti-smokers on this thread, you will be under no obligation to enter a smoking premise and can keep you clothes smelling squeaky clean.
9

K Darragh,

leyland 02/02/2008 20:53:58
I smoke and the authorities should allow a percentage of pubs to allow smoking,that way both sides are happy.
10

PAUL123,

02/02/2008 22:02:32
PACK IT IN PEOPLE FAGS THAT IS THERE HORRIBLE AND THEY STINK!! FROM AN EX 20 A DAYA,AND YOU,LL BE RICHER TOO.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.