Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

jennings ford direct
Sponsored by
 
 
Tuesday, 9th February 2010

£100,000 bottled water bill

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
16 April 2009
Almost £100,000 of Lancashire taxpayers' money was spent on bottled water in one year, despite health bosses advising people to drink tap water.
The Evening Post can reveal Lancashire County Council spent £35,944 on bottled water last year while NHS Central Lancashire spent nearly £18,000 even though a litre of tap water costs less than 1p.

It comes a few months after the NHS unveiled a plan urging trusts to only use tap water for meetings in a bid to cut its "carbon footprint".

Maggi Morris, director of public health for NHS Central Lancashire, said: "Tap water has no adverse effect on health. It is healthy and also environmentally friendlier than bottled water."

Today, public organisations said they would now review their use of bottled water after the figures were exposed by the Evening Post.

An adult drinking the recommended eight glasses of water a day would pay £1 a year if drinking from the tap, compared to £500 for bottled mineral water.

A spokesman for NHS Central Lancashire, the primary care trust covering Preston, Chorley, South Ribble and West Lancashire, said: "The primary care trust uses mains-fed water chiller units at all but one of its sites instead of bottled water.

"This has proved to be more cost-effective.

"Both types of water, chiller units and traditional bottles, are classified on our accounts as 'bottled water'.

"In the financial year 2008/09, NHS Central Lancashire spent £17,907.25 on what is classified as 'bottled water' for use in its clinics, offices and premises, of which there are more than 80. This works out on average at £223.84 per site."

A spokesman for Lancashire County Council, which is still trying to claw back £10m marooned in the failed Icelandic bank Landsbanki, said: "The county council is looking into its bottled water arrangements with a view to making changes."

For full story see Thursday's LEP.

>> Vote in our latest web poll

Lancashire Evening Post

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 April 2009 7:56 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Preston
 
Prev
1
2
1

Hudds,

16/04/2009 09:12:29
Unbelievable. Who are these people who throw OUR money around like it's going out of fashion?
2

Joe Wilkins,

16/04/2009 09:18:37
They keep telling us how clean tap water is. Why don't THEY drink it?
3

fiendish,

16/04/2009 09:46:51
And again the knee-jerkers leap to condemn. Imagine 100 people in one big, open plan office with the nearest tap out of the office and down the corridor. In such a situation, tap water is impractical. but hey, they are only local government employees (SCUM!), let them dehydrate.
4

Hudds,

16/04/2009 10:04:18
Not a knee jerk reaction but a reaction of anger and frustration. This is MY money they are using.
Water fountains that chill tap water, buying their own water/drink from a vending machine or bringing water from home are all cheaper alternatives. Why should MY money be used to pay for peoples' refreshments just because they happen to work at a particular place?
5

fiendish,

16/04/2009 10:18:27
No Hudds, it's not YOUR money they are using, like it or not it's THEIR money - your tax (and mine) goes to them for them to spend on services. Staff need water. you've made a judgement on precisely ONE piece of info, the cost. how much would it cost to ensure that tap water was available to every member of staff in County Hall? You ever been? Know how big it is? Know what it's water infrastructure is like? no. you see a figure and you react. £35k is nothing in the grand scheme, it's less than 3p per person per year for Lancashire's population. You SHOULD be getting mad about REAL waste, like, how many 1st class rail trips to councillors take per year? How many pointless conferences? How many hotels and other expenses? Making sure that a workforce is kept hydrated and healthy is not a waste of money.
6

Hudds,

16/04/2009 10:26:00
I do get mad about the things you mentioned and extremely annoyed that politics is seen by many who work within it as a gravy train. Politicians and councillors finance their OTT lifestyle with MY money.
I work damned hard and I resent a penny of MY money being used for petty reasons - and that includes thousands of pounds on bottled water. I know I will be thirsty during the day so I buy water/drink from the shop or take my own to work. These workers should do the same. I might be wrong but don't County Hall workers also get free or subsidised parking too? WHY?????
7

fiendish,

16/04/2009 10:38:42
I don't know about parking, I think staff at county hall do pay now, but I would again try to look at the wider picture. How many staff are there who use cars? How many parking spaces in other parking areas are there? What would the impact be if county hall staff (or any other large workforce for that matter) had to park on Fishergate or the bus station? Is the parking infrastructure sturdy enough to support them? What would be the cost to local business? (EG - county hall staff all park on Fishergate, so no room for shoopers). Personally, I think local authorities should encourage staff to use public transport - lead by example and all that (but, er, not pay for it obviously!!)
8

Concerned resident and Parent,

16/04/2009 10:40:22
#7 - I assume that you work for the LEP - neither of you let the truth spoil a good story....
LCC staff dont get free parking - Employers have a legal requirement to supply clean drinking water to all staff - Number of LCC staff divided by 36K = cheaper than hundreds of people walking the corridors of County Hall looking for a tap (its a big place)- the water used is from a charitable source that donates to those in need
Sorry if thats not as good a head line as the one made up by LEP
9

cantona,

fulwood 16/04/2009 11:29:54
I think the point is being missed here a little bit.
I don;t think anyone should begrudge county hall staff have having access to water.
But try to give us a justification for having bottled water instead of coolers or tap water like anyone else and I'd love to hear it.
What annoys me is most of the bottled water will be used for high-ranking board meetings and execs, not necessarily your bog-standard employee.

I've just read the full version in the LEP and the NHS Trust spent £1,500 last year on bottled water, and damn difference from £35,000.
They can do it, why can't the rest of them?
It stinks
10

fiendish,

16/04/2009 11:45:57
#10 - I think you have to distinguish between bottled water and water from bottles. I think 'bottled water' brings to mind Evian or some 'lifestyle' spring water or something, whereas in actual fact it's just ordinary water in a very large bottle on top of a cooler. Meetings have water brought through in jugs with glasses provided and that comes from a tap!

Incidentally, the article says the Trust spent £18k and it's hard to judge the two figures together without an idea of numbers of employees and geographical spread.
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.